Managing Pesticide Resistance: Input‐Oriented Versus Result‐Oriented Tax Systems

ABSTRACT Pesticide resistance is a phenomenon that is becoming increasingly worrying. Heavy reliance on pesticides in the agricultural sector is at the core of this problem. In this paper, we analyse how farmers' pest control strategies can reduce pesticide resistance. We show that Integrated Pest Management is effective in limiting the growth of pesticide resistance. However, because one farmer's choices affect those of their neighbours, externalities remain and public policies are needed. We analyse two tax systems where one is polluting input‐oriented and the other is result‐oriented. We derive conditions under which both tax systems lead to socially optimal strategies. We show that a result‐oriented scheme needs less information on farmers' time preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.70079
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing Pesticide Resistance: Input‐Oriented Versus Result‐Oriented Tax Systems

Elsa Martin, Sophie Legras, Safiatou Barro
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Agricultural risk and resilience
article

Managing Pesticide Resistance: Input‐Oriented Versus Result‐Oriented Tax Systems

Elsa Martin, Sophie Legras, Safiatou Barro
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Pesticide resistance is a phenomenon that is becoming increasingly worrying. Heavy reliance on pesticides in the agricultural sector is at the core of this problem. In this paper, we analyse how farmers' pest control strategies can reduce pesticide resistance. We show that Integrated Pest Management is effective in limiting the growth of pesticide resistance. However, because one farmer's choices affect those of their neighbours, externalities remain and public policies are needed. We analyse two tax systems where one is polluting input‐oriented and the other is result‐oriented. We derive conditions under which both tax systems lead to socially optimal strategies. We show that a result‐oriented scheme needs less information on farmers' time preferences.

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsVol. 70(1)
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Centre d'économie et de sociologie appliquées à l'agriculture et aux espaces ruraux (FR), Institut Agro Dijon (FR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Agricultural risk and resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.