P27 Modelling and mechanisms of keloid fibroblast plasticity

Abstract Introduction and aims Incorrect wound repair can lead to keloid scars, which are unsuccessfully managed clinically because of limited understanding of aetiology, a lack of modelling of key scar features, and reliance on insufficient biomarkers. Recently, we discovered that keloid lesions have cartilage-like extracellular matrix, suggesting that keloid fibroblasts misdifferentiate to an inappropriate phenotype. Therefore, we hypothesize that keloid fibroblasts are more plastic than normal fibroblasts and aim to test their differentiation potential and underpinning epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms. Methods Primary keloid dermal fibroblasts (KDF) and adjacent normal skin (NDF) were cultured in standard two-dimensional (2D) conditions, then analysed with bulk Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin (ATAC) and RNA sequencing. To investigate whether KDFs have distinct plasticity, cells were exposed to differentiating culture conditions. Results The chromatin was globally more accessible in the KDF vs. NDF, a feature associated with stemness and plasticity. Indeed, keloid differentially accessible regions (DARs) were found to extensively overlap with the epigenetic signature of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of keloid DARs further confirmed that ‘cell differentiation’ and ‘embryonic morphogenesis’ are distinguishing features. Transcription factor motifs enriched in keloid revealed master regulators of chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation (e.g. RUNX1/2, TEAD). To compare the amenability of NDF vs. KDF to adopt different phenotypes, cells were subjected to prochondrogenic and proadipogenic conditions. In chondrogenic media in 2D monolayers and three-dimensional (3D) micromass culture conditions, alcian blue-positive staining was uniquely observed in KDF grown in both 2D and 3D, akin to keloid histology. Interestingly, KDF also showed more lipid accumulation compared with NDF in proadipogenic conditions. Conclusions The findings demonstrate the unique plasticity of keloid cells and provides evidence that this feature is in part regulated epigenetically. Pharmacological manipulation of the epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of the cartilage-like phenotype observed in disease is hypothesized to be of therapeutic value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf429.054
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P27 Modelling and mechanisms of keloid fibroblast plasticity

Willow Hight-Warburton, Emanuel Rognoni, Stavroula Tekkela, Tanya J. Shaw et al.
British Journal of Dermatology
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
article

P27 Modelling and mechanisms of keloid fibroblast plasticity

Willow Hight-Warburton, Emanuel Rognoni, Stavroula Tekkela, Tanya J. Shaw, Elena M. Drudi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction and aims Incorrect wound repair can lead to keloid scars, which are unsuccessfully managed clinically because of limited understanding of aetiology, a lack of modelling of key scar features, and reliance on insufficient biomarkers. Recently, we discovered that keloid lesions have cartilage-like extracellular matrix, suggesting that keloid fibroblasts misdifferentiate to an inappropriate phenotype. Therefore, we hypothesize that keloid fibroblasts are more plastic than normal fibroblasts and aim to test their differentiation potential and underpinning epigenetic and transcriptional mechanisms. Methods Primary keloid dermal fibroblasts (KDF) and adjacent normal skin (NDF) were cultured in standard two-dimensional (2D) conditions, then analysed with bulk Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin (ATAC) and RNA sequencing. To investigate whether KDFs have distinct plasticity, cells were exposed to differentiating culture conditions. Results The chromatin was globally more accessible in the KDF vs. NDF, a feature associated with stemness and plasticity. Indeed, keloid differentially accessible regions (DARs) were found to extensively overlap with the epigenetic signature of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. Gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of keloid DARs further confirmed that ‘cell differentiation’ and ‘embryonic morphogenesis’ are distinguishing features. Transcription factor motifs enriched in keloid revealed master regulators of chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation (e.g. RUNX1/2, TEAD). To compare the amenability of NDF vs. KDF to adopt different phenotypes, cells were subjected to prochondrogenic and proadipogenic conditions. In chondrogenic media in 2D monolayers and three-dimensional (3D) micromass culture conditions, alcian blue-positive staining was uniquely observed in KDF grown in both 2D and 3D, akin to keloid histology. Interestingly, KDF also showed more lipid accumulation compared with NDF in proadipogenic conditions. Conclusions The findings demonstrate the unique plasticity of keloid cells and provides evidence that this feature is in part regulated epigenetically. Pharmacological manipulation of the epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of the cartilage-like phenotype observed in disease is hypothesized to be of therapeutic value.

British Journal of DermatologyVol. 194(1)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), King's College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.