Evolution of Fungicide Resistant Pathogens in Grapes: <i>Erysiphe necator, Plasmopara viticola</i> , and <i>Botrytis cinerea</i>

<h3>Abstract</h3> <h3>Background and goals</h3> Powdery mildew (<i>Erysiphe necator</i>), downy mildew (<i>Plasmopara viticola</i>), and botrytis bunch rot (<i>Botrytis cinerea</i>) are among the most destructive diseases affecting grapevines worldwide. These diseases can severely impact both foliage and fruit, leading to substantial yield and quality losses. While cultural practices contribute to disease suppression, chemical control—particularly fungicides—remains the primary method for managing these diseases. Both multisite and site-specific fungicides are widely used, however, the intensive and repeated application of site-specific fungicides increases the risk of resistance development in pathogen populations. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of known fungicide resistance in <i>E. necator, P. viticola</i>, and <i>B. cinerea</i>, and to examine tools available for resistance monitoring. <h3>Methods and key findings</h3> We summarized findings from recent literature on the mechanisms and prevalence of fungicide resistance across major chemical classes used in viticulture. This review also evaluates diagnostic technologies ranging from traditional bioassays to emerging molecular tools which are currently used or have potential for detecting resistance in vineyard pathogens. Additionally, we highlight recent technological advances that could strengthen resistance monitoring and guide more sustainable fungicide use. <h3>Conclusions and significance</h3> Fungicide resistance poses a critical challenge to effective disease management in grape production. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current state of known fungicide resistance in <i>E. necator, P. viticola</i>, and <i>B. cinerea</i>, and explores current and emerging diagnostic tools for monitoring fungicide resistance. Practical insights are also provided for researchers, extension personnel, and growers seeking to integrate resistance management into long-term disease control planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2025.25031
Primary Topic
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of Fungicide Resistant Pathogens in Grapes: Erysiphe necator, Plasmopara viticola , and Botrytis cinerea

Michelle M. Moyer, Timothy D. Miles, Nancy Sharma
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
article

Evolution of Fungicide Resistant Pathogens in Grapes: Erysiphe necator, Plasmopara viticola , and Botrytis cinerea

Michelle M. Moyer, Timothy D. Miles, Nancy Sharma
article en

Abstract

<h3>Abstract</h3> <h3>Background and goals</h3> Powdery mildew (<i>Erysiphe necator</i>), downy mildew (<i>Plasmopara viticola</i>), and botrytis bunch rot (<i>Botrytis cinerea</i>) are among the most destructive diseases affecting grapevines worldwide. These diseases can severely impact both foliage and fruit, leading to substantial yield and quality losses. While cultural practices contribute to disease suppression, chemical control—particularly fungicides—remains the primary method for managing these diseases. Both multisite and site-specific fungicides are widely used, however, the intensive and repeated application of site-specific fungicides increases the risk of resistance development in pathogen populations. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of known fungicide resistance in <i>E. necator, P. viticola</i>, and <i>B. cinerea</i>, and to examine tools available for resistance monitoring. <h3>Methods and key findings</h3> We summarized findings from recent literature on the mechanisms and prevalence of fungicide resistance across major chemical classes used in viticulture. This review also evaluates diagnostic technologies ranging from traditional bioassays to emerging molecular tools which are currently used or have potential for detecting resistance in vineyard pathogens. Additionally, we highlight recent technological advances that could strengthen resistance monitoring and guide more sustainable fungicide use. <h3>Conclusions and significance</h3> Fungicide resistance poses a critical challenge to effective disease management in grape production. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current state of known fungicide resistance in <i>E. necator, P. viticola</i>, and <i>B. cinerea</i>, and explores current and emerging diagnostic tools for monitoring fungicide resistance. Practical insights are also provided for researchers, extension personnel, and growers seeking to integrate resistance management into long-term disease control planning.

American Journal of Enology and ViticultureVol. 76(2)
Washington State University (US), Michigan State University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Michigan State University, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Horticultural and Viticultural Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.