Harmonising indicators for the stakeholder worker in social life cycle assessment

Despite rising knowledge and application of S-LCA in social sustainability assessments, there are still challenges in identifying and implementing indicators that capture social matters. Social indicators are fundamental in S-LCA for being the means by which social impacts are measured. However, the wide profusion of different nomenclatures, definitions, calculation methods, etc., brings S-LCA into a challenging position where practices are still fragmented and, thus, case studies cannot be compared. This work sought to: 1) Analyse and provide a descriptive overview of worker-related indicators applied in S-LCA studies that used primary and secondary data; 2) Examine the adherence of the indicators to the S-LCA framework and ILO standards; and 3) Harmonise these indicators towards a more standardised conceptualization and application. The study encompassed a systematic literature review of case studies on S-LCA that used primary and secondary data indicators, applying a date coverage from 2009 to 2025. In total 219 papers were selected. The mapped indicators were analysed and compared against different criteria to identify similarities, discrepancies, and foundations in international standards, such as the International Labour Organisation's (ILO) and the Guidelines for S-LCA for Products and Organisations. Whenever information was lacking when verifying the indicators' completion or definition in relation to the reference documents, new indicators were proposed and/or better founded. The final list resulted in 149 comprehensive and consistent primary data indicators, and 92 secondary data, across 11 worker's subcategories. The harmonised lists can be applicable across different industries and socioeconomic contexts, supporting comparability and standardisation in S-LCA studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.12.014
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Harmonising indicators for the stakeholder worker in social life cycle assessment

Arij Mohamad Radwan Omar Chabrawi, Marzia Traverso, Abdurrahman Agus Syahroni, Joana Fedato Pogoda
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Harmonising indicators for the stakeholder worker in social life cycle assessment

Arij Mohamad Radwan Omar Chabrawi, Marzia Traverso, Abdurrahman Agus Syahroni, Joana Fedato Pogoda
article en

Abstract

Despite rising knowledge and application of S-LCA in social sustainability assessments, there are still challenges in identifying and implementing indicators that capture social matters. Social indicators are fundamental in S-LCA for being the means by which social impacts are measured. However, the wide profusion of different nomenclatures, definitions, calculation methods, etc., brings S-LCA into a challenging position where practices are still fragmented and, thus, case studies cannot be compared. This work sought to: 1) Analyse and provide a descriptive overview of worker-related indicators applied in S-LCA studies that used primary and secondary data; 2) Examine the adherence of the indicators to the S-LCA framework and ILO standards; and 3) Harmonise these indicators towards a more standardised conceptualization and application. The study encompassed a systematic literature review of case studies on S-LCA that used primary and secondary data indicators, applying a date coverage from 2009 to 2025. In total 219 papers were selected. The mapped indicators were analysed and compared against different criteria to identify similarities, discrepancies, and foundations in international standards, such as the International Labour Organisation's (ILO) and the Guidelines for S-LCA for Products and Organisations. Whenever information was lacking when verifying the indicators' completion or definition in relation to the reference documents, new indicators were proposed and/or better founded. The final list resulted in 149 comprehensive and consistent primary data indicators, and 92 secondary data, across 11 worker's subcategories. The harmonised lists can be applicable across different industries and socioeconomic contexts, supporting comparability and standardisation in S-LCA studies.

Sustainable Production and ConsumptionVol. 63
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Harmonising indicators for the stakeholder worker in social life cycle assessment — Arij Mohamad Radwan Omar Chabrawi, Marzia Traverso, et al. · Sustainable Production and Consumption (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS