A Study on Blue Infrastructure Governance from the Issue-Appeal Divergence Perspective: An Empirical Analysis Based on LDA and BERTopic Models

Enhancing blue infrastructure is a critical pathway to strengthening urban water resilience and improving living environments. However, divergent perceptions and demands among multiple stakeholders may lead to misalignment between governance priorities and implementation pathways, thereby limiting governance effectiveness. Recognizing and addressing these differences has become essential for enhancing the performance of blue infrastructure governance and public satisfaction. Taking Shaanxi Province as a case study, this research systematically identifies core issues and disparities in public demands regarding water governance of blue infrastructure by analyzing governmental documents and public demands. The study aims to support a shift in governance strategy from a “provision-driven” to a “demand-driven” approach. A “topic identification–demand extraction–problem diagnosis” framework is adopted: first, the LDA model is used to analyze government platform texts and derive a macro-level thematic framework; subsequently, the BERTopic model is applied to mine public comments and identify micro-level demands; finally, the Jaccard similarity algorithm is employed to compare the two sets of topics, revealing the gap between policy provisions and public demands. The findings indicate the following: first, government agendas are highly concentrated on macro-level strategies (the topic “Integrated Water Ecosystem Management and Strategic Planning” accounts for 72.91% of weighting), whereas public appeals focus on specific, micro-level daily concerns such as infrastructure quality, drinking water safety, and drainage blockages; second, the Jaccard semantic correlation between the two is generally low (ranging from 6.05% to 14.62%), confirming a significant “topic-term overlap”; third, spatial analysis further reveals a geographical mismatch, particularly in core urban areas, which exhibit a “system-lag” type of misalignment characterized by high public demand but insufficient governmental attention. The research aims to clarify governance discrepancies, providing a basis for optimizing policy priorities and enabling targeted governance, while also offering insights for establishing a sustainable water resource management system.