Differential impacts of propofol and etomidate on hemodynamic stability and postoperative cognition in elderly surgical patients: A retrospective observational analysis

As the aging population continues to expand, tailoring anesthetic strategies to improve safety and recovery outcomes in elderly patients has become increasingly important. Propofol and etomidate are 2 widely used agents for intravenous induction in general anesthesia, each with distinct pharmacologic properties. This study explores the comparative safety profiles and perioperative outcomes of these agents in an elderly surgical cohort. A retrospective observational study was conducted on 150 patients aged 65 and above who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia from January 2023 to January 2025. Participants were grouped according to the induction drug received: propofol (n = 77) or etomidate (n = 73). Primary outcomes included adverse reactions during induction (e.g., hypotension, myoclonus), intraoperative hemodynamic variability, emergence time, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and cognitive changes assessed via mini-mental state examination on the first postoperative day. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Propofol was linked to a significantly higher rate of hypotension during induction (36.4% vs 15.1%, P = .002), whereas etomidate induced more myoclonus (26.0% vs 3.9%, P < .001). Mean arterial pressure fluctuated less in the etomidate group during maintenance (8.6 ± 2.3 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 3.5 mm Hg, P < .001). Although propofol yielded quicker emergence (9.7 ± 2.9 minutes vs 12.5 ± 3.8 minutes, P = .001), it was associated with greater postoperative cognitive decline (P = .011). Postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence was higher with etomidate but did not reach statistical significance (P = .065). Propofol offers rapid recovery advantages but increases the risk of hypotension and cognitive impairment in elderly patients. Etomidate provides superior hemodynamic stability and better cognitive preservation postoperatively, albeit with a higher risk of myoclonus. Anesthetic choice in geriatric populations should be guided by individual risk profiles and perioperative goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-01-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000045674
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential impacts of propofol and etomidate on hemodynamic stability and postoperative cognition in elderly surgical patients: A retrospective observational analysis

Jing Zhang, Yujiao Chen, Yan He, Yulong Zhang
Medicine
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Differential impacts of propofol and etomidate on hemodynamic stability and postoperative cognition in elderly surgical patients: A retrospective observational analysis

Jing Zhang, Yujiao Chen, Yan He, Yulong Zhang
article en

Abstract

As the aging population continues to expand, tailoring anesthetic strategies to improve safety and recovery outcomes in elderly patients has become increasingly important. Propofol and etomidate are 2 widely used agents for intravenous induction in general anesthesia, each with distinct pharmacologic properties. This study explores the comparative safety profiles and perioperative outcomes of these agents in an elderly surgical cohort. A retrospective observational study was conducted on 150 patients aged 65 and above who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia from January 2023 to January 2025. Participants were grouped according to the induction drug received: propofol (n = 77) or etomidate (n = 73). Primary outcomes included adverse reactions during induction (e.g., hypotension, myoclonus), intraoperative hemodynamic variability, emergence time, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and cognitive changes assessed via mini-mental state examination on the first postoperative day. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Propofol was linked to a significantly higher rate of hypotension during induction (36.4% vs 15.1%, P = .002), whereas etomidate induced more myoclonus (26.0% vs 3.9%, P < .001). Mean arterial pressure fluctuated less in the etomidate group during maintenance (8.6 ± 2.3 mm Hg vs 12.0 ± 3.5 mm Hg, P < .001). Although propofol yielded quicker emergence (9.7 ± 2.9 minutes vs 12.5 ± 3.8 minutes, P = .001), it was associated with greater postoperative cognitive decline (P = .011). Postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence was higher with etomidate but did not reach statistical significance (P = .065). Propofol offers rapid recovery advantages but increases the risk of hypotension and cognitive impairment in elderly patients. Etomidate provides superior hemodynamic stability and better cognitive preservation postoperatively, albeit with a higher risk of myoclonus. Anesthetic choice in geriatric populations should be guided by individual risk profiles and perioperative goals.

MedicineVol. 105(1)
Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.