Kant’s Views on Race as “Pure” Philosophy?: Discussing Huaping Lu-Adler’s “Kant, Race, and Racism” (chapters 3 and 4)

Abstract This article discusses Huaping Lu-Adler’s book Kant, Race, and Racism, in particular the third and fourth chapters. These chapters undertake a double contextualization of Kant’s writings on race: first, within Kant’s work and, second, within the naturalists’ discussions of his time. The engagement with these chapters focuses on the relationship between philosophy and its “outside.” This relationship is discussed in three dimensions: first, in the relationship between philosophy and natural science (Naturforschung); second, in the relationship between philosophy and prejudice; and third, in the relationship between philosophy and practice. All of these dimensions revolve around the problem of how to grasp the specific meaning and role of philosophy in its historical social context—a systematic question that can be derived from Lu-Adler’s analysis, even if it is not explicitly central to her work. The main conclusion is that the problem expressed in Kant’s views on race is not so much that he succumbs to the particular, limiting, and prejudiced ways of thinking of his time but rather that, in doing so, he also relies on an understanding of philosophy that cannot conceive of its own situatedness; a philosophy that sees itself as detached from the world and cannot grasp its own practical implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Philosophy of Race
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5325/critphilrace.13.2.0284
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kant’s Views on Race as “Pure” Philosophy?: Discussing Huaping Lu-Adler’s “Kant, Race, and Racism” (chapters 3 and 4)

Marina Martínez Mateo
Critical Philosophy of Race
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Kant’s Views on Race as “Pure” Philosophy?: Discussing Huaping Lu-Adler’s “Kant, Race, and Racism” (chapters 3 and 4)

Marina Martínez Mateo
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses Huaping Lu-Adler’s book Kant, Race, and Racism, in particular the third and fourth chapters. These chapters undertake a double contextualization of Kant’s writings on race: first, within Kant’s work and, second, within the naturalists’ discussions of his time. The engagement with these chapters focuses on the relationship between philosophy and its “outside.” This relationship is discussed in three dimensions: first, in the relationship between philosophy and natural science (Naturforschung); second, in the relationship between philosophy and prejudice; and third, in the relationship between philosophy and practice. All of these dimensions revolve around the problem of how to grasp the specific meaning and role of philosophy in its historical social context—a systematic question that can be derived from Lu-Adler’s analysis, even if it is not explicitly central to her work. The main conclusion is that the problem expressed in Kant’s views on race is not so much that he succumbs to the particular, limiting, and prejudiced ways of thinking of his time but rather that, in doing so, he also relies on an understanding of philosophy that cannot conceive of its own situatedness; a philosophy that sees itself as detached from the world and cannot grasp its own practical implications.

Critical Philosophy of RaceVol. 13(2)
Academy of Fine Arts Munich (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.