Surgical Management of Oroantral Fistula: Locoregional Flaps and Evaluation of Closure Outcomes

Aim To evaluate surgical techniques used for oroantral fistula (OAF) repair in an otolaryngology setting and to assess closure success in relation to etiologic, demographic, and operative factors. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent surgical repair of OAF at a tertiary otolaryngology unit between 2007 and 2024. Clinical records were reviewed for demographic, etiologic, and operative variables and OAF closure success. A significance threshold of p< .05 was applied for group comparisons. Results Thirty-six patients underwent 40 OAF repair procedures. Odontogenic causes accounted for 77.5% of cases, whereas tumor-related etiologies represented 17.5%. Concomitant maxillary sinusitis treated with simultaneous functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) was present in 42.5% of cases. Overall, successful closure was achieved in 35 of 40 procedures (87.5%), including three of five initial failures after revision surgery. Among procedures using a single flap, buccal advancement and palatal flaps yielded similar success rates (80.0% vs 93.8%; p=.333). Success rates did not differ between single and combined flap techniques (89.3% vs 83.3%; p=1.000), between procedures with and without grafts (90.0% vs 86.7%; p=1.000), or between cases managed with or without FESS (82.4% vs 91.3%; p=.634). Age, sex, and smoking were not associated with closure failure. Conclusion OAF repair in an otolaryngology setting achieved high success rates. When sinus disease is controlled and flap selection is tailored to defect characteristics and patient factors, both buccal and palatal approaches provide reliable closure. These findings support multidisciplinary management and close collaboration between dental clinicians and otolaryngologists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi
Published
2025-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36516/jocass.1829621
Primary Topic
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surgical Management of Oroantral Fistula: Locoregional Flaps and Evaluation of Closure Outcomes

Cömert Sen, Said Sönmez, Ömer Orak, Vedat Emre Alayoğlu et al.
Cukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler Dergisi
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
article

Surgical Management of Oroantral Fistula: Locoregional Flaps and Evaluation of Closure Outcomes

Cömert Sen, Said Sönmez, Ömer Orak, Vedat Emre Alayoğlu, Bora Başaran
article en

Abstract

Aim To evaluate surgical techniques used for oroantral fistula (OAF) repair in an otolaryngology setting and to assess closure success in relation to etiologic, demographic, and operative factors. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent surgical repair of OAF at a tertiary otolaryngology unit between 2007 and 2024. Clinical records were reviewed for demographic, etiologic, and operative variables and OAF closure success. A significance threshold of p< .05 was applied for group comparisons. Results Thirty-six patients underwent 40 OAF repair procedures. Odontogenic causes accounted for 77.5% of cases, whereas tumor-related etiologies represented 17.5%. Concomitant maxillary sinusitis treated with simultaneous functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) was present in 42.5% of cases. Overall, successful closure was achieved in 35 of 40 procedures (87.5%), including three of five initial failures after revision surgery. Among procedures using a single flap, buccal advancement and palatal flaps yielded similar success rates (80.0% vs 93.8%; p=.333). Success rates did not differ between single and combined flap techniques (89.3% vs 83.3%; p=1.000), between procedures with and without grafts (90.0% vs 86.7%; p=1.000), or between cases managed with or without FESS (82.4% vs 91.3%; p=.634). Age, sex, and smoking were not associated with closure failure. Conclusion OAF repair in an otolaryngology setting achieved high success rates. When sinus disease is controlled and flap selection is tailored to defect characteristics and patient factors, both buccal and palatal approaches provide reliable closure. These findings support multidisciplinary management and close collaboration between dental clinicians and otolaryngologists.

Cukurova Anestezi ve Cerrahi Bilimler DergisiVol. 8(4)
Istanbul University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.