The sensitivity of smoke aerosol dispersion to smoke injection height and source-strength: a multi-model AeroCom study

Abstract. The near-source and downwind impacts of smoke aerosols depend on both emitted mass and injection height. This study examines aerosol dispersion sensitivity to these factors using four global models from the AeroCom Phase III Biomass Burning Emission and Injection Height (BBEIH) experiment. Each model performed four simulations: BASE, using burned-area-based BB emissions GFED4.1s with default injection heights; BBIH, using monthly MISR plume injection heights; BBEM, using fire- radiative-power-based BB emission FEERv1.0; and NOBB, excluding BB emissions. The focus is the April 2008 Siberian wildfire event. Aerosol optical depth (AOD) varies across models. In BASE, all models show a steeper AOD decline from the source to downwind regions than satellite data, indicating inadequate long-range transport or excessive aerosol removal in all models. Moreover, near-source, most models overestimate aerosol extinction below 2 km, suggesting injection heights are too low. In BBIH, MISR plume injection heights slightly improve vertical aerosol distribution, but the magnitude is too small. In BBEM, AOD increases significantly near the source due to enhanced BB emissions; however, the downwind AOD remains largely underestimated in both BBIH and BBEM. Notably, CALIOP lidar reveals aerosol layers above 6 km from source to downwind regions – features absent in all model simulations, although a high bias in the gridded CALIOP data makes the evaluation inconclusive. These results suggest that monthly MISR plume injection heights and enhanced BB emissions alone are insufficient to resolve the model–observation discrepancies. Injecting smoke at higher altitudes in Siberia and reducing aerosol wet removal warrant further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-171-2026
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The sensitivity of smoke aerosol dispersion to smoke injection height and source-strength: a multi-model AeroCom study

D. Kim, Mian Chin, Hitoshi Matsui, Ralph A. Kahn et al.
Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Fire effects on ecosystems
article

The sensitivity of smoke aerosol dispersion to smoke injection height and source-strength: a multi-model AeroCom study

D. Kim, Mian Chin, Hitoshi Matsui, Ralph A. Kahn, Yuanyu Xie, Maria Val Martin, Toshihiko Takemura, Meiyun Lin, Xiaohua Pan
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The near-source and downwind impacts of smoke aerosols depend on both emitted mass and injection height. This study examines aerosol dispersion sensitivity to these factors using four global models from the AeroCom Phase III Biomass Burning Emission and Injection Height (BBEIH) experiment. Each model performed four simulations: BASE, using burned-area-based BB emissions GFED4.1s with default injection heights; BBIH, using monthly MISR plume injection heights; BBEM, using fire- radiative-power-based BB emission FEERv1.0; and NOBB, excluding BB emissions. The focus is the April 2008 Siberian wildfire event. Aerosol optical depth (AOD) varies across models. In BASE, all models show a steeper AOD decline from the source to downwind regions than satellite data, indicating inadequate long-range transport or excessive aerosol removal in all models. Moreover, near-source, most models overestimate aerosol extinction below 2 km, suggesting injection heights are too low. In BBIH, MISR plume injection heights slightly improve vertical aerosol distribution, but the magnitude is too small. In BBEM, AOD increases significantly near the source due to enhanced BB emissions; however, the downwind AOD remains largely underestimated in both BBIH and BBEM. Notably, CALIOP lidar reveals aerosol layers above 6 km from source to downwind regions – features absent in all model simulations, although a high bias in the gridded CALIOP data makes the evaluation inconclusive. These results suggest that monthly MISR plume injection heights and enhanced BB emissions alone are insufficient to resolve the model–observation discrepancies. Injecting smoke at higher altitudes in Siberia and reducing aerosol wet removal warrant further investigation.

Atmospheric chemistry and physicsVol. 26(1)
Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Kyushu University (JP), NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (US), Princeton Public Schools (US), Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics (US), Adnet Systems (United States) (US), Nagoya University (JP), University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Global Foundation for Eating Disorders, Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Goddard Space Flight Center, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Fire effects on ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.