Better Balance for Patients with Lumbar AIS

Kwan et al. present an interesting concept for balancing surgical-magnitude Lenke type-5 and 6 curves using an intraoperative technique based on calculations from preoperative side-bending radiographs followed by intraoperative measurements relative to a crossbar. Postoperative coronal imbalance is often difficult to predict and control in such patients, and the authors give surgeons a pragmatic intraoperative tool to predict satisfactory alignment, which achieved that result at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively in 37 of 39 patients. After a few simple preoperative calculations have been performed, comparison with the intraoperative crossbar on fluoroscopy can quickly allow the surgeon to adjust the correction of the major curve, if necessary, to obtain the postoperative standing balance desired. The authors have further refined previous work by Tolo and others1 for application in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who are not undergoing fusion to the pelvis. Rather than relying on “eyeball verification” of intraoperative radiographic alignment, the more quantitative technique presented by Kwan et al. is likely to achieve a more reproducible long-term result, benefiting patients seeking treatment of their scoliotic curves. Surgeons adopting this technique will undoubtedly become facile with it and find additional uses for it. For example, given the study’s findings that failure to match the intraoperative lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) tilt angle (β angle) to the preoperative supine right-sided-bending (RSB) LIV tilt angle adjusted for pelvic obliquity (PO) (α angle) yields persistent coronal imbalance due to under- or overcorrection of the thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve, one can postulate that this technique may also assist in the complex and controversial choice between L3 and L4 as the LIV for Lenke-5 and 6 curve types, thereby potentially eliminating the need for revision surgery for persistent and symptomatic postoperative coronal imbalance2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.25.01076
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Better Balance for Patients with Lumbar AIS

Todd F. Ritzman, Mark J. Adamczyk
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Better Balance for Patients with Lumbar AIS

Todd F. Ritzman, Mark J. Adamczyk
article en

Abstract

Kwan et al. present an interesting concept for balancing surgical-magnitude Lenke type-5 and 6 curves using an intraoperative technique based on calculations from preoperative side-bending radiographs followed by intraoperative measurements relative to a crossbar. Postoperative coronal imbalance is often difficult to predict and control in such patients, and the authors give surgeons a pragmatic intraoperative tool to predict satisfactory alignment, which achieved that result at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively in 37 of 39 patients. After a few simple preoperative calculations have been performed, comparison with the intraoperative crossbar on fluoroscopy can quickly allow the surgeon to adjust the correction of the major curve, if necessary, to obtain the postoperative standing balance desired. The authors have further refined previous work by Tolo and others1 for application in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who are not undergoing fusion to the pelvis. Rather than relying on “eyeball verification” of intraoperative radiographic alignment, the more quantitative technique presented by Kwan et al. is likely to achieve a more reproducible long-term result, benefiting patients seeking treatment of their scoliotic curves. Surgeons adopting this technique will undoubtedly become facile with it and find additional uses for it. For example, given the study’s findings that failure to match the intraoperative lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) tilt angle (β angle) to the preoperative supine right-sided-bending (RSB) LIV tilt angle adjusted for pelvic obliquity (PO) (α angle) yields persistent coronal imbalance due to under- or overcorrection of the thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve, one can postulate that this technique may also assist in the complex and controversial choice between L3 and L4 as the LIV for Lenke-5 and 6 curve types, thereby potentially eliminating the need for revision surgery for persistent and symptomatic postoperative coronal imbalance2.

Journal of Bone and Joint SurgeryVol. 108(1)
Akron Children's Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.