The Use of Taxonomies in Constructing Text-Based Reading Comprehension Questions: Bloom and Barrett Taxonomies

The aim of this study is to investigate how preservice Turkish language teachers construct reading comprehension questions based on Bloom’s and Barrett’s taxonomies. Adopting a qualitative case study design, data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The study focuses on the cognitive levels of the questions, participants’ perceptions and preferences regarding the taxonomies, reported changes in pedagogical awareness and professional competence following taxonomy-based instruction, and the challenges encountered during the question-design process. The findings suggest that preservice teachers tended to engage more with higher-order cognitive processes when using Barrett’s taxonomy during the question-design process. Participants perceived Barrett’s taxonomy as more functional and structured for evaluating reading comprehension, particularly in relation to inferential, evaluative, and affective aspects. In contrast, Bloom’s taxonomy was more commonly associated with questions targeting lower- and mid-level cognitive skills, such as remembering and understanding, whereas higher-level categories were addressed less frequently. Despite increased awareness in constructing and assessing questions after the instructional process, participants continued to experience difficulties in differentiating between taxonomic levels and formulating higher-order questions. Overall, the findings point to the complementary strengths of the two taxonomies and suggest that their integrated use in reading instruction may support teachers in designing more cognitively rich questions that foster deeper comprehension and critical thinking. This study contributes by illustrating how taxonomy-based instruction differentially shapes preservice teachers’ question-design practices and by highlighting the complementary strengths of Bloom’s and Barrett’s taxonomies in supporting higher-order, text-based reading comprehension.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1716522
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use of Taxonomies in Constructing Text-Based Reading Comprehension Questions: Bloom and Barrett Taxonomies

Pınar Kanık Uysal
e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
article

The Use of Taxonomies in Constructing Text-Based Reading Comprehension Questions: Bloom and Barrett Taxonomies

Pınar Kanık Uysal
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate how preservice Turkish language teachers construct reading comprehension questions based on Bloom’s and Barrett’s taxonomies. Adopting a qualitative case study design, data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The study focuses on the cognitive levels of the questions, participants’ perceptions and preferences regarding the taxonomies, reported changes in pedagogical awareness and professional competence following taxonomy-based instruction, and the challenges encountered during the question-design process. The findings suggest that preservice teachers tended to engage more with higher-order cognitive processes when using Barrett’s taxonomy during the question-design process. Participants perceived Barrett’s taxonomy as more functional and structured for evaluating reading comprehension, particularly in relation to inferential, evaluative, and affective aspects. In contrast, Bloom’s taxonomy was more commonly associated with questions targeting lower- and mid-level cognitive skills, such as remembering and understanding, whereas higher-level categories were addressed less frequently. Despite increased awareness in constructing and assessing questions after the instructional process, participants continued to experience difficulties in differentiating between taxonomic levels and formulating higher-order questions. Overall, the findings point to the complementary strengths of the two taxonomies and suggest that their integrated use in reading instruction may support teachers in designing more cognitively rich questions that foster deeper comprehension and critical thinking. This study contributes by illustrating how taxonomy-based instruction differentially shapes preservice teachers’ question-design practices and by highlighting the complementary strengths of Bloom’s and Barrett’s taxonomies in supporting higher-order, text-based reading comprehension.

e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları DergisiVol. 12(3)
Ordu University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Use of Taxonomies in Constructing Text-Based Reading Comprehension Questions: Bloom and Barrett Taxonomies — Pınar Kanık Uysal · e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS