Disparities in ambient air pollution exposure among the U.S. population amid climate change

Air pollution and climate change remain critical environmental challenges. Using integrated modeling (global change analysis model [GCAM] and TM5-FASST), we assess future U.S. ambient air pollution (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>) and exposure disparities under climate mitigation scenarios. Nationally, annual mean O<sub>3</sub> declines from 58.3 ppbv in 2010 to 47.3-54.1 ppbv by 2050, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> decreases from 6.5 μgm to -3 to 4.6-5.7 μgm<sup>-3</sup> depending on scenario. Regional differences persist, with elevated O<sub>3</sub> along the West Coast, Northeast, and Great Lakes, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> hotspots above 12 μgm<sup>-3</sup> in the eastern U.S. Sensitivity analysis shows socioeconomic pathways drive >90% of early-term pollutant reduction variance, but their contribution declines to about 70% by mid-century. Disparities narrow between white and Black communities but widen between white and Asian groups, reflecting urban exposure patterns. These results highlight the importance of both emission targets and structural socioeconomic choices in shaping future air quality and underscore the need for targeted equity-focused interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.114603
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in ambient air pollution exposure among the U.S. population amid climate change

Gokul Iyer, Yue Qin, Fatemeh Ganji, Lu Liu et al.
iScience
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Disparities in ambient air pollution exposure among the U.S. population amid climate change

Gokul Iyer, Yue Qin, Fatemeh Ganji, Lu Liu, Neal Graham, Jon Sampedro, Yuyu Zhou
article en

Abstract

Air pollution and climate change remain critical environmental challenges. Using integrated modeling (global change analysis model [GCAM] and TM5-FASST), we assess future U.S. ambient air pollution (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>) and exposure disparities under climate mitigation scenarios. Nationally, annual mean O<sub>3</sub> declines from 58.3 ppbv in 2010 to 47.3-54.1 ppbv by 2050, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> decreases from 6.5 μgm to -3 to 4.6-5.7 μgm<sup>-3</sup> depending on scenario. Regional differences persist, with elevated O<sub>3</sub> along the West Coast, Northeast, and Great Lakes, and PM<sub>2.5</sub> hotspots above 12 μgm<sup>-3</sup> in the eastern U.S. Sensitivity analysis shows socioeconomic pathways drive >90% of early-term pollutant reduction variance, but their contribution declines to about 70% by mid-century. Disparities narrow between white and Black communities but widen between white and Asian groups, reflecting urban exposure patterns. These results highlight the importance of both emission targets and structural socioeconomic choices in shaping future air quality and underscore the need for targeted equity-focused interventions.

iScienceVol. 29(2)
Iowa State University (US), Peking University (CN), Basque Centre for Climate Change (ES), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.