Cost-effectiveness analysis of bridge-to-transplantation temporary mechanical circulatory support versus non-bridged heart transplantation
In this economic evaluation study, BTT-tMCS therapy was more likely to be cost-effective compared with non-bridged HTx.
Authors
- Clifford Silver Tarimo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0672-9471)
- Bin Yang
- Zhanlei Shen
- Qing Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3087-4692)
- Jingming Wei
- Yudong Miao
- Yuhan Li
- Chunhui Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7178-5742)
- Soumitra S. Bhuyan
- Jianping Hu
- Qingyong Lu
- Xiuli An
- Lei Yin
- Xinran Li
- Yafei Si
- Zhiming Zhou
- Wanliang Zhang
- Pengfei Wang
Institutions
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Dar es Salaam Institute of Technology (TZ)
- Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Zhengzhou University (CN)
- Zhengzhou People's Hospital (CN)
- Henan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Public Health
- Published
- 2026-01-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1687327
- Primary Topic
- Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science and Technology Major Project