Imputing Censored Covariates and Evaluating Predictive Models: Applications to Huntington Disease

In longitudinal studies of Huntington disease, many patients are not diagnosed during follow-up. This phenomenon, known as random right censoring, creates challenges for both estimation and prediction. This dissertation contributes new statistical methods and empirical evaluations to address right-censored data and applies these tools to observational studies of Huntington disease. The first chapter strengthens a recent method for right-censored covariates, known as Cox-based conditional mean imputation (CMI). We derive the correct form of the conditional mean, correcting errors in recent publications and strengthening the method’s theoretical foundation. To support practical implementation, we also provide an open-source R package for Cox-based CMI. In the second chapter, we propose a nonparametric CMI method based on the generalized Kaplan-Meier estimator. This estimator allows us to impute the conditional mean of a censored covariate, without assuming a specific distribution or proportional hazards. We prove the consistency of this estimator when used in linear regression, and empirically demonstrate its improved performance over Cox-based CMI under heavy censoring. We apply this method to data from an observational study of Huntington disease to better understand how patients' apathy scores evolve over time. The final chapter compares four existing models that predict time to clinical diagnosis of Huntington disease. We assess each model’s ability to stratify patients by risk using censoring-appropriate metrics, doing so with both published parameters and new estimates obtained via cross-validation. This analysis highlights a clear trade-off between model complexity and predictive performance. Finally, we demonstrate how these models can be used to selectively recruit patients for a preventative clinical trial, and estimate sample sizes for varying effect sizes and trial durations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/am6z-n650
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Imputing Censored Covariates and Evaluating Predictive Models: Applications to Huntington Disease

Kyle Frederic Grosser
UNC Libraries
Statistical Methods and Inference
article

Imputing Censored Covariates and Evaluating Predictive Models: Applications to Huntington Disease

Kyle Frederic Grosser
article en

Abstract

In longitudinal studies of Huntington disease, many patients are not diagnosed during follow-up. This phenomenon, known as random right censoring, creates challenges for both estimation and prediction. This dissertation contributes new statistical methods and empirical evaluations to address right-censored data and applies these tools to observational studies of Huntington disease. The first chapter strengthens a recent method for right-censored covariates, known as Cox-based conditional mean imputation (CMI). We derive the correct form of the conditional mean, correcting errors in recent publications and strengthening the method’s theoretical foundation. To support practical implementation, we also provide an open-source R package for Cox-based CMI. In the second chapter, we propose a nonparametric CMI method based on the generalized Kaplan-Meier estimator. This estimator allows us to impute the conditional mean of a censored covariate, without assuming a specific distribution or proportional hazards. We prove the consistency of this estimator when used in linear regression, and empirically demonstrate its improved performance over Cox-based CMI under heavy censoring. We apply this method to data from an observational study of Huntington disease to better understand how patients' apathy scores evolve over time. The final chapter compares four existing models that predict time to clinical diagnosis of Huntington disease. We assess each model’s ability to stratify patients by risk using censoring-appropriate metrics, doing so with both published parameters and new estimates obtained via cross-validation. This analysis highlights a clear trade-off between model complexity and predictive performance. Finally, we demonstrate how these models can be used to selectively recruit patients for a preventative clinical trial, and estimate sample sizes for varying effect sizes and trial durations.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Statistical Methods and Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Imputing Censored Covariates and Evaluating Predictive Models: Applications to Huntington Disease — Kyle Frederic Grosser · UNC Libraries (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS