Leading Brands' Communication of Product Innovativeness to Generation Z: A Mixed‐Methods Study

ABSTRACT Despite extensive research on product innovation, comparatively little attention has been given to how product innovativeness is or ought to be communicated to young consumers. This study systematically analyzes 700 newly released videos from S&P 500 consumer brands to examine how innovativeness cues are incorporated into their communications for new products. Findings reveal that the majority of these videos focus on imitative or incremental innovations rather than radical ones. Among the innovativeness cues, “relative advantage” was most frequently featured, whereas “technological novelty” appeared least often. These cues also tend to align with specific advertising appeals. To gain deeper understanding into young audiences' perceptions, the video analysis was complemented by 18 focus group interviews with Generation Z consumers aged 18–28. The results suggest that the innovativeness cue “coolness” is more appropriately captured by the broader and more inclusive term “emotional arousal,” while a new cue, “trendy/timely,” emerged from the analysis. Informants recommended employing a comparative advertising approach and emphasizing emotional arousal when communicating product innovativeness. These findings extend the literature on product innovativeness communication and offer valuable insights for practitioners seeking effective strategies to convey and enhance the perceived innovativeness of new products to younger consumer cohorts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70176
Primary Topic
Generational Differences and Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leading Brands' Communication of Product Innovativeness to Generation Z: A Mixed‐Methods Study

Fanny Fong Yee Chan, Ben Lowe, John B. Ford
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Generational Differences and Trends
article

Leading Brands' Communication of Product Innovativeness to Generation Z: A Mixed‐Methods Study

Fanny Fong Yee Chan, Ben Lowe, John B. Ford
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite extensive research on product innovation, comparatively little attention has been given to how product innovativeness is or ought to be communicated to young consumers. This study systematically analyzes 700 newly released videos from S&P 500 consumer brands to examine how innovativeness cues are incorporated into their communications for new products. Findings reveal that the majority of these videos focus on imitative or incremental innovations rather than radical ones. Among the innovativeness cues, “relative advantage” was most frequently featured, whereas “technological novelty” appeared least often. These cues also tend to align with specific advertising appeals. To gain deeper understanding into young audiences' perceptions, the video analysis was complemented by 18 focus group interviews with Generation Z consumers aged 18–28. The results suggest that the innovativeness cue “coolness” is more appropriately captured by the broader and more inclusive term “emotional arousal,” while a new cue, “trendy/timely,” emerged from the analysis. Informants recommended employing a comparative advertising approach and emphasizing emotional arousal when communicating product innovativeness. These findings extend the literature on product innovativeness communication and offer valuable insights for practitioners seeking effective strategies to convey and enhance the perceived innovativeness of new products to younger consumer cohorts.

International Journal of Consumer StudiesVol. 50(1)
University of Kent (GB), Hang Seng University of Hong Kong (HK), Old Dominion University (US), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Generational Differences and Trends
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.