Comparative analysis of microstructural segmentation techniques on SEM and optical micrographs

Since grain morphology, distribution, and interfaces have significant effects on mechanical and functional properties, accurate microstructural characterization is still indispensable to materials research. The segmentation of Al+SiC nanocomposites using backscattered electron SEM images and the segmentation of Al-Zn-Mg powder metallurgy alloys using optical micrographs are compared in this paper. This comparison, rather than reporting material-specific results, attempts to present a broader methodological perspective by trying to distill general insights into how various imaging modalities drive algorithmic choices. These accuracy aspects are not revisited here because both have already shown high accuracy in automated segmentation and grain boundary detection. Rather, focus is on how image modality, preprocessing specifications, segmentation pipelines, and post-processing techniques interact to determine the robustness, flexibility, and possible transferability of automated microstructural analysis workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EPJ Web of Conferences
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202634501030
Primary Topic
Microstructure and mechanical properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of microstructural segmentation techniques on SEM and optical micrographs

Katika Harikrishna
EPJ Web of Conferences
Microstructure and mechanical properties
article

Comparative analysis of microstructural segmentation techniques on SEM and optical micrographs

Katika Harikrishna
article en

Abstract

Since grain morphology, distribution, and interfaces have significant effects on mechanical and functional properties, accurate microstructural characterization is still indispensable to materials research. The segmentation of Al+SiC nanocomposites using backscattered electron SEM images and the segmentation of Al-Zn-Mg powder metallurgy alloys using optical micrographs are compared in this paper. This comparison, rather than reporting material-specific results, attempts to present a broader methodological perspective by trying to distill general insights into how various imaging modalities drive algorithmic choices. These accuracy aspects are not revisited here because both have already shown high accuracy in automated segmentation and grain boundary detection. Rather, focus is on how image modality, preprocessing specifications, segmentation pipelines, and post-processing techniques interact to determine the robustness, flexibility, and possible transferability of automated microstructural analysis workflows.

EPJ Web of ConferencesVol. 345
Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Microstructure and mechanical properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.