A mathematical framework to correct for compositionality in microbiome data sets

The increasing use of metagenomic sequencing (MGS) for microbiome analysis has significantly advanced our understanding of microbial communities and their roles in various biological processes, including human health, environmental cycling, and disease. However, the inherent compositionality of MGS data, where the relative abundance of each taxon depends on the abundance of all other taxa, complicates the measurement of individual taxa and the interpretation of microbiome data. Here, we describe an experimental design that incorporates exogenous internal standards in routine MGS analyses to correct for compositional distortions. A mathematical framework was developed for using the observed internal standard relative abundance to calculate "Scaled Abundances" for native taxa that were (i) independent of sample composition and (ii) directly proportional to actual biological abundances. Through analysis of mock community and human gut microbiome samples, we demonstrate that Scaled Abundances outperformed traditional relative abundance measurements in both precision and accuracy and enabled reliable, quantitative comparisons of individual microbiome taxa across varied sample compositions and across a wide range of taxon abundances. By providing a pathway to accurate taxon quantification, this approach holds significant potential for advancing microbiome research, particularly in clinical and environmental health applications where precise microbial profiling is critical.IMPORTANCEMetagenomic sequencing (MGS) analysis has become central to modern characterizations of microbiome samples. However, the inherent compositionality of these analyses, where the relative abundance of each taxon depends on the abundance of all other taxa, often complicates interpretations of results. We present here an experimental design and corresponding mathematical framework that uses internal standards with routine MGS methods to correct for compositional distortions. We validate this approach for both amplicon and shotgun MGS analysis of mock communities and human gut microbiome (fecal) samples. By using internal standards to remove compositionality, we demonstrate significantly improved measurement accuracy and precision for quantification of taxon abundances. This approach is broadly applicable across a wide range of microbiome research applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01126-25
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A mathematical framework to correct for compositionality in microbiome data sets

Samuel P. Forry, Stephanie L. Servetas, Jason G. Kralj, Scott A. Jackson et al.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Gut microbiota and health
article

A mathematical framework to correct for compositionality in microbiome data sets

Samuel P. Forry, Stephanie L. Servetas, Jason G. Kralj, Scott A. Jackson, Monique E. Hunter, Jennifer N. Dootz
article en

Abstract

The increasing use of metagenomic sequencing (MGS) for microbiome analysis has significantly advanced our understanding of microbial communities and their roles in various biological processes, including human health, environmental cycling, and disease. However, the inherent compositionality of MGS data, where the relative abundance of each taxon depends on the abundance of all other taxa, complicates the measurement of individual taxa and the interpretation of microbiome data. Here, we describe an experimental design that incorporates exogenous internal standards in routine MGS analyses to correct for compositional distortions. A mathematical framework was developed for using the observed internal standard relative abundance to calculate "Scaled Abundances" for native taxa that were (i) independent of sample composition and (ii) directly proportional to actual biological abundances. Through analysis of mock community and human gut microbiome samples, we demonstrate that Scaled Abundances outperformed traditional relative abundance measurements in both precision and accuracy and enabled reliable, quantitative comparisons of individual microbiome taxa across varied sample compositions and across a wide range of taxon abundances. By providing a pathway to accurate taxon quantification, this approach holds significant potential for advancing microbiome research, particularly in clinical and environmental health applications where precise microbial profiling is critical.IMPORTANCEMetagenomic sequencing (MGS) analysis has become central to modern characterizations of microbiome samples. However, the inherent compositionality of these analyses, where the relative abundance of each taxon depends on the abundance of all other taxa, often complicates interpretations of results. We present here an experimental design and corresponding mathematical framework that uses internal standards with routine MGS methods to correct for compositional distortions. We validate this approach for both amplicon and shotgun MGS analysis of mock communities and human gut microbiome (fecal) samples. By using internal standards to remove compositionality, we demonstrate significantly improved measurement accuracy and precision for quantification of taxon abundances. This approach is broadly applicable across a wide range of microbiome research applications.

Applied and Environmental MicrobiologyVol. 92(1)
HTD Biosystems (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.