Communication of Business‐Nonprofit Collaborations and Environmental Legitimacy: Exploratory Insights From Italian Firms

ABSTRACT Collaborations with nonprofits can enhance firms' legitimacy, yet the relationship between their communication and corporate environmental legitimacy remains poorly understood. Furthermore, research lacks an analysis of the communication of business‐nonprofit collaborations through multiple actors' perspectives. Employing a mixed‐methods content analysis, we analyze 440 firm, nonprofit and media communications on 91 business‐nonprofit collaborations involving Italian firms in environmentally sensitive industries. Our exploratory results indicate that firms' communication is influenced by their environmental legitimacy—firms with stronger environmental legitimacy tend to frame collaborations as substantive rather than symbolic efforts. Furthermore, the media, unlike nonprofit partners, emphasize the symbolic nature of corporate involvement and adopt a negative tone when covering collaborations by firms with weaker environmental legitimacy. Interpreting our findings, we propose that less legitimate firms prioritize pragmatic rather than moral forms of legitimacy in their communication, and vice versa. Our results contribute to research and inform practice by deepening the empirical and conceptual understanding of the relationship between corporate environmental legitimacy, strategic legitimation objectives, and the framing of sustainability communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70519
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communication of Business‐Nonprofit Collaborations and Environmental Legitimacy: Exploratory Insights From Italian Firms

Daniel Lundgaard, María Alejandra Torres‐Cuello, Andrea Rizzuni, Steen Vallentin
Business Strategy and the Environment
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Communication of Business‐Nonprofit Collaborations and Environmental Legitimacy: Exploratory Insights From Italian Firms

Daniel Lundgaard, María Alejandra Torres‐Cuello, Andrea Rizzuni, Steen Vallentin
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Collaborations with nonprofits can enhance firms' legitimacy, yet the relationship between their communication and corporate environmental legitimacy remains poorly understood. Furthermore, research lacks an analysis of the communication of business‐nonprofit collaborations through multiple actors' perspectives. Employing a mixed‐methods content analysis, we analyze 440 firm, nonprofit and media communications on 91 business‐nonprofit collaborations involving Italian firms in environmentally sensitive industries. Our exploratory results indicate that firms' communication is influenced by their environmental legitimacy—firms with stronger environmental legitimacy tend to frame collaborations as substantive rather than symbolic efforts. Furthermore, the media, unlike nonprofit partners, emphasize the symbolic nature of corporate involvement and adopt a negative tone when covering collaborations by firms with weaker environmental legitimacy. Interpreting our findings, we propose that less legitimate firms prioritize pragmatic rather than moral forms of legitimacy in their communication, and vice versa. Our results contribute to research and inform practice by deepening the empirical and conceptual understanding of the relationship between corporate environmental legitimacy, strategic legitimation objectives, and the framing of sustainability communication.

Business Strategy and the Environment
Copenhagen Business School (DK), Oldham Council (GB), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Steadman Philippon Research Institute
Life in Land, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.