Artificial intelligence classification of rectal neoplasia by endoscopic fluorescence perfusion analysis

Disordered vascularity is a hallmark of carcinogenesis. Fluorescence microperfusion heterogeneity may discriminate malignant transformation within significant (> 20 mm) rectal polyps enabling in-situ endoscopic classification via machine learning (ML) methods to inform clinical care. Patients referred for transanal management of rectal neoplasia were recruited. Indocyanine green was administered intravenously and near-infrared (NIR) endoscopic video recorded. Videos were processed with bespoke fluorescence quantification software producing intensity-timeseries plots for neoplastic and normal regions of interest in the same patients. Plot features were extracted to train/test ML classification algorithms, including coefficient of variation (CV), reporting cancer characterisation sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. 190 video recordings from 182 patients (57.9% with cancer) from six cancer centres provided usable dataset (91% of 201 consenting patients). Overall, the software accurately tracked and detailed NIR perfusion features from, on average (SD), 74.7% (25.3) of annotated regions of interest over the five-minute recording phase. The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy rates of traditional endoscopic biopsy (n = 172), MRI (n = 139) and expert surgeon opinion (n = 190) at surgery were 70.8%/100%/81.7%, 85.4%/ 44.1%/72.7% and 79.1%/80%/79.5% respectively. In comparison, trained ML sensitivity/specificity/ accuracy was 77.6%/39.8%/61.1% and 73.5%/48.2%/62.6% with base and CV featured algorithms respectively. Combining point of care clinical data (specifically MRI and clinicians’ preoperative predictions) with the ML algorithms improved sensitivity/specificity/accuracy to 86.0%/71.1%/79.5% and 82.2%/74.7%/79.0% respectively. Malignant transformation precipitates discriminant perfusion patterns, in a manner exploitable digitally, that indicate cancer presence in significant rectal polyps. Combining clinical indicators appears to improve classification accuracy further, especially specificity. Trial registration: Future of Colorectal Cancer Surgery (FOOCCuS1). Clinicatrials.gov. NCT04220242. Clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04220242. CLASSICA: Validating AI in Classifying Cancer in Real-Time Surgery. Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT05793554. Clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05793554.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35233-x
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial intelligence classification of rectal neoplasia by endoscopic fluorescence perfusion analysis

Patrick A. Boland, Felix Aigner, Alberto Arezzo, Ashokkumar Singaravelu et al.
Scientific Reports
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Artificial intelligence classification of rectal neoplasia by endoscopic fluorescence perfusion analysis

Patrick A. Boland, Felix Aigner, Alberto Arezzo, Ashokkumar Singaravelu, Philip D. McEntee, Pol MacAonghusa, J. Cucek, Samo Eržen, P Neary, Ronan A Cahill, J. Tuynman, Roel Hompes, John P. Burke
article en

Abstract

Disordered vascularity is a hallmark of carcinogenesis. Fluorescence microperfusion heterogeneity may discriminate malignant transformation within significant (> 20 mm) rectal polyps enabling in-situ endoscopic classification via machine learning (ML) methods to inform clinical care. Patients referred for transanal management of rectal neoplasia were recruited. Indocyanine green was administered intravenously and near-infrared (NIR) endoscopic video recorded. Videos were processed with bespoke fluorescence quantification software producing intensity-timeseries plots for neoplastic and normal regions of interest in the same patients. Plot features were extracted to train/test ML classification algorithms, including coefficient of variation (CV), reporting cancer characterisation sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. 190 video recordings from 182 patients (57.9% with cancer) from six cancer centres provided usable dataset (91% of 201 consenting patients). Overall, the software accurately tracked and detailed NIR perfusion features from, on average (SD), 74.7% (25.3) of annotated regions of interest over the five-minute recording phase. The sensitivity/specificity/accuracy rates of traditional endoscopic biopsy (n = 172), MRI (n = 139) and expert surgeon opinion (n = 190) at surgery were 70.8%/100%/81.7%, 85.4%/ 44.1%/72.7% and 79.1%/80%/79.5% respectively. In comparison, trained ML sensitivity/specificity/ accuracy was 77.6%/39.8%/61.1% and 73.5%/48.2%/62.6% with base and CV featured algorithms respectively. Combining point of care clinical data (specifically MRI and clinicians’ preoperative predictions) with the ML algorithms improved sensitivity/specificity/accuracy to 86.0%/71.1%/79.5% and 82.2%/74.7%/79.0% respectively. Malignant transformation precipitates discriminant perfusion patterns, in a manner exploitable digitally, that indicate cancer presence in significant rectal polyps. Combining clinical indicators appears to improve classification accuracy further, especially specificity. Trial registration: Future of Colorectal Cancer Surgery (FOOCCuS1). Clinicatrials.gov. NCT04220242. Clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04220242. CLASSICA: Validating AI in Classifying Cancer in Real-Time Surgery. Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT05793554. Clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05793554.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
University College Dublin (IE), University Hospital Waterford (IE), Beaumont Hospital (IE), Mater Misericordiae University Hospital (IE), Food for Health Ireland (IE), Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern (AT), Hospital of the Brothers of St. John of God (AT), Faculty of Applied Social Studies in Nova Gorica (SI), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Turin (IT), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Arthrex, Stryker, Astellas Pharma, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.