O27 Spatial transcriptomic profiles of photoexposed and photoprotected skin in lighter- and darker-skinned individuals

Abstract Introduction and aims Significant progress has been made in understanding physiological differences between photoexposed and photoprotected skin in healthy human adults, including in different skin types. However, how these may link to transcriptional differences at the single-cell level is unknown. Here, we compared spatial transcriptomic profiles of photoexposed and photoprotected healthy skin from young light- and dark-skinned individuals. Methods Skin punch biopsies were obtained from the forearm (photoexposed) and buttock (photoprotected) of healthy volunteers (aged 22–29 years) of skin type I–II (n = 4) and V–VI (n = 4). Biopsies were cryosectioned and analysed using the Prime 5K panel (5001 genes) on the Xenium In Situ platform (10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA, USA). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (> 0.5 log2 fold change, < 0.05 Q-value) were identified and analysed by Qiagen Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Results Compared with photoprotected skin, photoexposed skin displayed 464 and 107 DEGs in light- and dark-skinned individuals, respectively. Light, but not dark photoexposed skin exhibited upregulation of chemokines CCL22 and CCL19, and matrix metalloproteinase 9, and downregulation of transcription factor NR4A1, a regulator of the cell cycle and inflammation. Pathways associated with collagen and extracellular matrix degradation were enriched in both light and dark photoexposed skin. Enrichment of pathways involved in proinflammatory signalling, oxidative stress, and senescence were observed exclusively in light photoexposed skin. DEGs associated with senescence and oxidative stress pathways were expressed in multiple cell types across the epidermis and dermis. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that photoexposed skin of young light-skinned individuals exhibits a distinct inflammatory profile compared with photoprotected regions. Moreover, photoexposed darker skin did not display the cellular senescence and oxidative stress transcriptomic profile observed in lighter skin, suggesting an intrinsically lower oxidative stress status. These differences may link to the structural and functional differences seen in photoexposed and photoprotected skin in different skin types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljaf429.027
Primary Topic
Skin Protection and Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O27 Spatial transcriptomic profiles of photoexposed and photoprotected skin in lighter- and darker-skinned individuals

Bezaleel Mambwe, A.K. Langton, Mark D. Farrar, Michael Peake et al.
British Journal of Dermatology
Skin Protection and Aging
article

O27 Spatial transcriptomic profiles of photoexposed and photoprotected skin in lighter- and darker-skinned individuals

Bezaleel Mambwe, A.K. Langton, Mark D. Farrar, Michael Peake, Mike Bell, Clare O’Connor
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction and aims Significant progress has been made in understanding physiological differences between photoexposed and photoprotected skin in healthy human adults, including in different skin types. However, how these may link to transcriptional differences at the single-cell level is unknown. Here, we compared spatial transcriptomic profiles of photoexposed and photoprotected healthy skin from young light- and dark-skinned individuals. Methods Skin punch biopsies were obtained from the forearm (photoexposed) and buttock (photoprotected) of healthy volunteers (aged 22–29 years) of skin type I–II (n = 4) and V–VI (n = 4). Biopsies were cryosectioned and analysed using the Prime 5K panel (5001 genes) on the Xenium In Situ platform (10x Genomics, Pleasanton, CA, USA). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (> 0.5 log2 fold change, < 0.05 Q-value) were identified and analysed by Qiagen Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Results Compared with photoprotected skin, photoexposed skin displayed 464 and 107 DEGs in light- and dark-skinned individuals, respectively. Light, but not dark photoexposed skin exhibited upregulation of chemokines CCL22 and CCL19, and matrix metalloproteinase 9, and downregulation of transcription factor NR4A1, a regulator of the cell cycle and inflammation. Pathways associated with collagen and extracellular matrix degradation were enriched in both light and dark photoexposed skin. Enrichment of pathways involved in proinflammatory signalling, oxidative stress, and senescence were observed exclusively in light photoexposed skin. DEGs associated with senescence and oxidative stress pathways were expressed in multiple cell types across the epidermis and dermis. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that photoexposed skin of young light-skinned individuals exhibits a distinct inflammatory profile compared with photoprotected regions. Moreover, photoexposed darker skin did not display the cellular senescence and oxidative stress transcriptomic profile observed in lighter skin, suggesting an intrinsically lower oxidative stress status. These differences may link to the structural and functional differences seen in photoexposed and photoprotected skin in different skin types.

British Journal of DermatologyVol. 194(1)
University of Manchester (GB), Chrysalis Health & Beauty (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Skin Protection and Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.