Evaluation of the reliability, informational content, and quality of YouTube videos on cervical disc herniation

BackgroundYouTube has become a widely used resource for patients and healthcare professionals seeking information on cervical disc herniation. However, the reliability and quality of online content show substantial variability.ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability, informational content and quality of YouTube videos related to cervical disc herniation.MethodsThis cross-sectional study included YouTube videos related to cervical disc herniation, identified through searches using the terms "cervical disc herniation," "disc herniation of cervical spine," and "herniated cervical disc." Video characteristics such as duration, views, likes, comments, and content creator profiles were recorded. Reliability and quality were assessed using the DISCERN instrument, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Scale (GQS).ResultsA total of 300 videos (100 for each search term) were initially retrieved. After excluding duplicates, non-English, irrelevant, or very short videos, 104 unique videos were included in the study. Of the included videos, 41.3% were uploaded by physicians, 30.7% by non-physician healthcare professionals, 14.4% by medical channels, 8.7% by healthcare institutions, and 4.8% by patients. The mean DISCERN score was 35.3 ± 7.6, the mean JAMA score was 2.4 ± 0.6, and the mean GQS score was 3.5 ± 0.8, indicating generally poor to fair quality. The median (range) scores were 35.0 (17.0-58.0) for DISCERN, 2.0 (1.0-4.0) for JAMA, and 4.0 (1.0-5.0) for GQS. According to JAMA, 55.8% of the videos scored 2 points, reflecting low reliability, while only 2.9% achieved the maximum score of 4. In GQS, 52.9% were rated as high quality, 38.5% as moderate, and 8.6% as low. Correlation analyses showed that longer video duration was positively associated with higher DISCERN (r = 0.41-0.57, p < 0.001), JAMA (r = 0.36, p < 0.001), and GQS scores (r = 0.35, p < 0.001).ConclusionMost of the included YouTube videos on cervical disc herniation demonstrated low to moderate reliability. These findings emphasize the need for healthcare professionals and patients to critically appraise such content, and they highlight the importance of developing higher-quality, evidence-based online educational resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251412592
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the reliability, informational content, and quality of YouTube videos on cervical disc herniation

Emine Üstün, Sibel Caglar, B. Aydeniz, M. Fethullah Simsek et al.
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Evaluation of the reliability, informational content, and quality of YouTube videos on cervical disc herniation

Emine Üstün, Sibel Caglar, B. Aydeniz, M. Fethullah Simsek, Turker Suleymanoglu
article en

Abstract

BackgroundYouTube has become a widely used resource for patients and healthcare professionals seeking information on cervical disc herniation. However, the reliability and quality of online content show substantial variability.ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability, informational content and quality of YouTube videos related to cervical disc herniation.MethodsThis cross-sectional study included YouTube videos related to cervical disc herniation, identified through searches using the terms "cervical disc herniation," "disc herniation of cervical spine," and "herniated cervical disc." Video characteristics such as duration, views, likes, comments, and content creator profiles were recorded. Reliability and quality were assessed using the DISCERN instrument, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and the Global Quality Scale (GQS).ResultsA total of 300 videos (100 for each search term) were initially retrieved. After excluding duplicates, non-English, irrelevant, or very short videos, 104 unique videos were included in the study. Of the included videos, 41.3% were uploaded by physicians, 30.7% by non-physician healthcare professionals, 14.4% by medical channels, 8.7% by healthcare institutions, and 4.8% by patients. The mean DISCERN score was 35.3 ± 7.6, the mean JAMA score was 2.4 ± 0.6, and the mean GQS score was 3.5 ± 0.8, indicating generally poor to fair quality. The median (range) scores were 35.0 (17.0-58.0) for DISCERN, 2.0 (1.0-4.0) for JAMA, and 4.0 (1.0-5.0) for GQS. According to JAMA, 55.8% of the videos scored 2 points, reflecting low reliability, while only 2.9% achieved the maximum score of 4. In GQS, 52.9% were rated as high quality, 38.5% as moderate, and 8.6% as low. Correlation analyses showed that longer video duration was positively associated with higher DISCERN (r = 0.41-0.57, p < 0.001), JAMA (r = 0.36, p < 0.001), and GQS scores (r = 0.35, p < 0.001).ConclusionMost of the included YouTube videos on cervical disc herniation demonstrated low to moderate reliability. These findings emphasize the need for healthcare professionals and patients to critically appraise such content, and they highlight the importance of developing higher-quality, evidence-based online educational resources.

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
State Hospital (GB), Bakırköy Dr.Sadi Konuk Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.