A framework for optimising arthropod DNA quality and quantity for modern sequencing tools using hard ticks (Ixodidae)

Advanced sequencing technologies require strict standards for DNA input and integrity. This study addresses the challenge of extracting high-quality, endogenous DNA from smaller arthropods with mixed DNA sources (arthropod, host, and microbiome), using Amblyomma triguttatum as a model organism. We evaluated three tissue types (Whole, Bisected, and Legs), three disruption methods (Undisrupted, Sliced, and liquid nitrogen bead Homogenisation), and two extraction kits (Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue and MagAttract HMW) to optimise DNA yield, quality, and composition. The Qiagen MagAttract High Molecular Weight Kit significantly increased the proportion of large DNA fragments (20-48.5 kbp) by 11-fold compared to the Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit. Aggressive homogenisation methods produced the highest proportion of short fragments (97%, 1-10 kbp). Whole-Homogenised specimens yielded the highest DNA concentration (198 ng µL⁻¹), whereas Bisected-Undisrupted specimens achieved 146 ng µL⁻¹ with a greater proportion of large fragments (3.15%). Bacterial DNA content remained consistent across treatments. Our findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate extraction methods to ensure optimal DNA quality for advanced sequencing applications. These results provide useful guidelines for optimising DNA extractions from smaller-bodied arthropods (~ 10-20 mg) and establish a framework for future studies to consider DNA quantity, quality, and composition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Parasitology Research
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-025-08583-0
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for optimising arthropod DNA quality and quantity for modern sequencing tools using hard ticks (Ixodidae)

C. L. Oskam, X. W. Barton, J. B. Fontaine, S. S. Tobe
Parasitology Research
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

A framework for optimising arthropod DNA quality and quantity for modern sequencing tools using hard ticks (Ixodidae)

C. L. Oskam, X. W. Barton, J. B. Fontaine, S. S. Tobe
article en

Abstract

Advanced sequencing technologies require strict standards for DNA input and integrity. This study addresses the challenge of extracting high-quality, endogenous DNA from smaller arthropods with mixed DNA sources (arthropod, host, and microbiome), using Amblyomma triguttatum as a model organism. We evaluated three tissue types (Whole, Bisected, and Legs), three disruption methods (Undisrupted, Sliced, and liquid nitrogen bead Homogenisation), and two extraction kits (Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue and MagAttract HMW) to optimise DNA yield, quality, and composition. The Qiagen MagAttract High Molecular Weight Kit significantly increased the proportion of large DNA fragments (20-48.5 kbp) by 11-fold compared to the Qiagen DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit. Aggressive homogenisation methods produced the highest proportion of short fragments (97%, 1-10 kbp). Whole-Homogenised specimens yielded the highest DNA concentration (198 ng µL⁻¹), whereas Bisected-Undisrupted specimens achieved 146 ng µL⁻¹ with a greater proportion of large fragments (3.15%). Bacterial DNA content remained consistent across treatments. Our findings highlight the importance of selecting appropriate extraction methods to ensure optimal DNA quality for advanced sequencing applications. These results provide useful guidelines for optimising DNA extractions from smaller-bodied arthropods (~ 10-20 mg) and establish a framework for future studies to consider DNA quantity, quality, and composition.

Parasitology ResearchVol. 125(1)
Murdoch University (AU)
Murdoch University
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.