Bias corrections of ERA5 and ERA5-land temperature using automatic weather station data in the Higher Central Himalaya: implications for hydro-meteorological and glaciological research

Dokriani Glacier Catchment (DGC), Central Himalaya. This study evaluates and corrects biases of ERA5 and ERA5-Land (ERA5L) mean temperature (T MEAN ) data for the DGC, using high-resolution daily observations from three Automatic Weather Stations (AWSs) in distinct settings: glacierized, proglacial, and forested. Five methods including Delta Change (DC), Linear Regression (LR), Empirical Quantile Mapping (EQM), Quantile Delta Mapping (QDM), and Generalized Additive Models (GAM) were used to identify the most effective method for correcting reanalysis data based on AWS observations at daily, monthly, and seasonal timescales (2011–2014) using bias, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), correlation coefficient, and coefficient of determination. LR and GAM were the most effective, reducing biases to near zero and RMSE by up to 86 % at the seasonal scale, enabling more reliable climate-driven hydrological modeling, glaciological studies, and water-resource management in this monsoon-influenced region. Seasonal drivers can differentially influence dataset-specific corrections, with ERA5L showing substantial reductions in RMSE during monsoon periods. Hydrological models incorporating such improvements provide vital information for downstream river systems that are critical for South Asian livelihoods, agriculture, and hydropower. In contrast, ERA5 showed slight improvements, with biases that were significantly dependent on grid size; finer resolutions resulted in better error reduction. The validation based on 2014–2015 data confirmed that the LR and GAM methods effectively minimized the errors in the reanalysis dataset. • For the first time, ERA5 and ERA5-Land data were assessed for temperature bias. • GAM and LR reduce biases to near zero in Himalayan catchment. • Up to 86 % RMSE improvement can enhances hydrological modeling accuracy. • Seasonal bias corrections are vital for monsoon-driven glacier melt studies. • ERA5-Land must be prioritized in glacio-hydrological and climate impact studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.103079
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bias corrections of ERA5 and ERA5-land temperature using automatic weather station data in the Higher Central Himalaya: implications for hydro-meteorological and glaciological research

Jairam Singh Yadav, Rakesh Bhambri, Soumya Satyapragyan
Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Bias corrections of ERA5 and ERA5-land temperature using automatic weather station data in the Higher Central Himalaya: implications for hydro-meteorological and glaciological research

Jairam Singh Yadav, Rakesh Bhambri, Soumya Satyapragyan
article en

Abstract

Dokriani Glacier Catchment (DGC), Central Himalaya. This study evaluates and corrects biases of ERA5 and ERA5-Land (ERA5L) mean temperature (T MEAN ) data for the DGC, using high-resolution daily observations from three Automatic Weather Stations (AWSs) in distinct settings: glacierized, proglacial, and forested. Five methods including Delta Change (DC), Linear Regression (LR), Empirical Quantile Mapping (EQM), Quantile Delta Mapping (QDM), and Generalized Additive Models (GAM) were used to identify the most effective method for correcting reanalysis data based on AWS observations at daily, monthly, and seasonal timescales (2011–2014) using bias, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), correlation coefficient, and coefficient of determination. LR and GAM were the most effective, reducing biases to near zero and RMSE by up to 86 % at the seasonal scale, enabling more reliable climate-driven hydrological modeling, glaciological studies, and water-resource management in this monsoon-influenced region. Seasonal drivers can differentially influence dataset-specific corrections, with ERA5L showing substantial reductions in RMSE during monsoon periods. Hydrological models incorporating such improvements provide vital information for downstream river systems that are critical for South Asian livelihoods, agriculture, and hydropower. In contrast, ERA5 showed slight improvements, with biases that were significantly dependent on grid size; finer resolutions resulted in better error reduction. The validation based on 2014–2015 data confirmed that the LR and GAM methods effectively minimized the errors in the reanalysis dataset. • For the first time, ERA5 and ERA5-Land data were assessed for temperature bias. • GAM and LR reduce biases to near zero in Himalayan catchment. • Up to 86 % RMSE improvement can enhances hydrological modeling accuracy. • Seasonal bias corrections are vital for monsoon-driven glacier melt studies. • ERA5-Land must be prioritized in glacio-hydrological and climate impact studies.

Journal of Hydrology Regional StudiesVol. 63
Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology (IN), Institute of Management Technology (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.