Segmentation of medial temporal lobe subregions in a nearly isotropic space using T2‐weighted MRI with anisotropic resolution

Abstract Background Morphometry of medial temporal lobe (MTL) subregions in brain MRI is sensitive biomarker to Alzheimer's Disease and other related conditions. While T2‐weighted (T2w) MRI with high in‐plane resolution is widely used to segment hippocampal subfields due to its higher contrast in hippocampus, its lower out‐of‐plane resolution reduces the accuracy of subregion thickness measurements. To address this issue, we developed a nearly isotropic segmentation pipeline that incorporates image and label upsampling and high‐resolution segmentation in T2w MRI. Method First, a high‐resolution atlas was created based on an existing anisotropic atlas derived from 29 individuals. Both T1‐weighted and T2w images in the atlas were upsampled from their original resolution to a nearly isotropic resolution using a non‐local means approach. Manual segmentations within the atlas were also upsampled to match this resolution using a UNet‐based neural network, which was trained on a cohort consisting of both high‐resolution ex vivo and low‐resolution anisotropic in vivo MRI with manual segmentations (Figure 1a). Second, a multi‐modality deep learning‐based segmentation model was trained within this nearly isotropic atlas (Figure 1b). This method was evaluated on independent sets, including cross‐sectional ( N = 196) and longitudinal ( N = 31) MRI scans, which were used for the group difference analysis (Amyloid+ mild cognitive impairment (A+MCI) vs. Amyloid‐ cognitively normal (A‐CN)) and longitudinal consistency analysis, respectively (Figure 1c). Result Table 1(a) displays the group differences of cross‐sectional median thickness between A+MCI and A‐CN with age as covariate. The T2w segmentation in isotropic space achieved larger effect sizes in the predicted direction (A+MCI < A‐CN) and outperformed T2w anisotropic segmentation over most subregions. Table 1(b) shows the consistency analysis of longitudinal median thickness. When measured as the sum of absolute median thickness differences, the consistency of isotropic T2w segmentation outperformed that of anisotropic T2w segmentation over most subregions. Figure 2 shows the visualization of the segmentation and point‐wise group difference analysis at different resolutions, with isotropic T2w segmentation demonstrating a smoother surface and larger effect sizes than anisotropic T2w segmentation. Conclusion Nearly isotropic subregion segmentation improved the accuracy of cortical thickness as an imaging biomarker for neurodegeneration in T2w MRI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_105240
Primary Topic
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Segmentation of medial temporal lobe subregions in a nearly isotropic space using T2‐weighted MRI with anisotropic resolution

Amanda E Denning, Pulkit Khandelwal, David A. Wolk, Nidhi S. Mundada et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
article

Segmentation of medial temporal lobe subregions in a nearly isotropic space using T2‐weighted MRI with anisotropic resolution

Amanda E Denning, Pulkit Khandelwal, David A. Wolk, Nidhi S. Mundada, Long Xie, Yue Li, Emily McGrew, Laura E.M. Wisse, Paul A. Yushkevich, Christopher A Brown, Sandhitsu R. Das
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Morphometry of medial temporal lobe (MTL) subregions in brain MRI is sensitive biomarker to Alzheimer's Disease and other related conditions. While T2‐weighted (T2w) MRI with high in‐plane resolution is widely used to segment hippocampal subfields due to its higher contrast in hippocampus, its lower out‐of‐plane resolution reduces the accuracy of subregion thickness measurements. To address this issue, we developed a nearly isotropic segmentation pipeline that incorporates image and label upsampling and high‐resolution segmentation in T2w MRI. Method First, a high‐resolution atlas was created based on an existing anisotropic atlas derived from 29 individuals. Both T1‐weighted and T2w images in the atlas were upsampled from their original resolution to a nearly isotropic resolution using a non‐local means approach. Manual segmentations within the atlas were also upsampled to match this resolution using a UNet‐based neural network, which was trained on a cohort consisting of both high‐resolution ex vivo and low‐resolution anisotropic in vivo MRI with manual segmentations (Figure 1a). Second, a multi‐modality deep learning‐based segmentation model was trained within this nearly isotropic atlas (Figure 1b). This method was evaluated on independent sets, including cross‐sectional ( N = 196) and longitudinal ( N = 31) MRI scans, which were used for the group difference analysis (Amyloid+ mild cognitive impairment (A+MCI) vs. Amyloid‐ cognitively normal (A‐CN)) and longitudinal consistency analysis, respectively (Figure 1c). Result Table 1(a) displays the group differences of cross‐sectional median thickness between A+MCI and A‐CN with age as covariate. The T2w segmentation in isotropic space achieved larger effect sizes in the predicted direction (A+MCI < A‐CN) and outperformed T2w anisotropic segmentation over most subregions. Table 1(b) shows the consistency analysis of longitudinal median thickness. When measured as the sum of absolute median thickness differences, the consistency of isotropic T2w segmentation outperformed that of anisotropic T2w segmentation over most subregions. Figure 2 shows the visualization of the segmentation and point‐wise group difference analysis at different resolutions, with isotropic T2w segmentation demonstrating a smoother surface and larger effect sizes than anisotropic T2w segmentation. Conclusion Nearly isotropic subregion segmentation improved the accuracy of cortical thickness as an imaging biomarker for neurodegeneration in T2w MRI.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Lund University (SE), Siemens (United States) (US), Siemens Healthcare (United States) (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.