Transportation, ride-hailing and discrimination among the blind and low vision community

• App-based ride-hailing services such as Uber and Lyft significantly improve access to destinations for blind and low vision users. • Ride-hailing services are also the transport mode in which discrimination is most frequently reported by the blind and low vision community. • Blind and low vision individuals with guide dogs report higher levels of discrimination using ride-hailing than non-guide dog users. • Respondents expressed slightly greater satisfaction with Lyft than with Uber. Individuals with disabilities, including those who are blind or have low vision (BLV), travel less frequently than non-disabled individuals due to persistent barriers across transportation modes. Ride-hailing services such as Uber and Lyft offer the potential to enhance mobility for the BLV community by providing flexible, on-demand travel options. However, many BLV individuals also experience discrimination when using these services, and there is a lack of research on their transportation and discrimination experiences. This study used an online survey as the first part of a mixed-methods research project to document and quantify the transportation experiences of BLV individuals, with a focus on ride-hailing. We explored differences in user satisfaction and perceptions of discrimination between Uber and Lyft and examined whether guide dog use contributes to higher rates of service denial or mistreatment. Our findings indicate that while ride-hailing services significantly improve access to destinations for BLV users, they are also the mode in which discrimination is most frequently reported. Guide dog users face notably higher rates of ride refusals. Respondents expressed slightly greater satisfaction with Lyft than with Uber. These findings underscore the dual nature of ride-hailing for BLV individuals: it offers greater independence but also introduces new challenges. This research has implications for ride-hailing companies seeking to improve accessibility, and for public agencies partnering with these platforms to deliver equitable, on-demand transportation services.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2026.101837
Primary Topic
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transportation, ride-hailing and discrimination among the blind and low vision community

Nels Grevstad, Sylvia Brady, Sarah A. Schliemann, C. Glatthar
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
article

Transportation, ride-hailing and discrimination among the blind and low vision community

Nels Grevstad, Sylvia Brady, Sarah A. Schliemann, C. Glatthar
article en

Abstract

• App-based ride-hailing services such as Uber and Lyft significantly improve access to destinations for blind and low vision users. • Ride-hailing services are also the transport mode in which discrimination is most frequently reported by the blind and low vision community. • Blind and low vision individuals with guide dogs report higher levels of discrimination using ride-hailing than non-guide dog users. • Respondents expressed slightly greater satisfaction with Lyft than with Uber. Individuals with disabilities, including those who are blind or have low vision (BLV), travel less frequently than non-disabled individuals due to persistent barriers across transportation modes. Ride-hailing services such as Uber and Lyft offer the potential to enhance mobility for the BLV community by providing flexible, on-demand travel options. However, many BLV individuals also experience discrimination when using these services, and there is a lack of research on their transportation and discrimination experiences. This study used an online survey as the first part of a mixed-methods research project to document and quantify the transportation experiences of BLV individuals, with a focus on ride-hailing. We explored differences in user satisfaction and perceptions of discrimination between Uber and Lyft and examined whether guide dog use contributes to higher rates of service denial or mistreatment. Our findings indicate that while ride-hailing services significantly improve access to destinations for BLV users, they are also the mode in which discrimination is most frequently reported. Guide dog users face notably higher rates of ride refusals. Respondents expressed slightly greater satisfaction with Lyft than with Uber. These findings underscore the dual nature of ride-hailing for BLV individuals: it offers greater independence but also introduces new challenges. This research has implications for ride-hailing companies seeking to improve accessibility, and for public agencies partnering with these platforms to deliver equitable, on-demand transportation services.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 36
Metropolitan State University of Denver (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Tactile and Sensory Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.