Theory of planar ballistic SNS junctions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math>

This Letter presents the theory of planar ballistic superconductor–normal metal–superconductor junctions at <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>T</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>0</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:math> for any normal layer thickness <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mi>L</b:mi> </b:math> taking into account phase gradients in superconducting leads. The current-phase relation was derived in the model of the steplike pairing potential analytically and is exact in the limit of large ratio of the Fermi energy to the superconducting gap. At small <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mi>L</c:mi> </c:math> (short junction) the obtained current-phase relation is essentially different from that in the previous theory neglecting phase gradients. It was confirmed by recent numerical calculations and was observed in the experiment on short InAs nanowire Josephson junctions. The analysis resolves the problem with the charge conservation law in the steplike pairing potential model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/2g8w-bbpd
Primary Topic
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Theory of planar ballistic SNS junctions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math>

Anonymous
Physical review. B./Physical review. B
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
article

Theory of planar ballistic SNS junctions at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math>

Anonymous
article en

Abstract

This Letter presents the theory of planar ballistic superconductor–normal metal–superconductor junctions at <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <a:mrow> <a:mi>T</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>0</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:math> for any normal layer thickness <b:math xmlns:b="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <b:mi>L</b:mi> </b:math> taking into account phase gradients in superconducting leads. The current-phase relation was derived in the model of the steplike pairing potential analytically and is exact in the limit of large ratio of the Fermi energy to the superconducting gap. At small <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <c:mi>L</c:mi> </c:math> (short junction) the obtained current-phase relation is essentially different from that in the previous theory neglecting phase gradients. It was confirmed by recent numerical calculations and was observed in the experiment on short InAs nanowire Josephson junctions. The analysis resolves the problem with the charge conservation law in the steplike pairing potential model.

Physical review. B./Physical review. BVol. 113(6)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.