Sustainable solar assisted drying of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a comparative study on energy use, rehydration and sensory attributes

Drying chickpeas to produce ready to reconstitute products offers a sustainable approach to improving their convenience and utilization. However, drying is energy-intensive, and optimization is essential for both efficiency and product quality. This study investigated the drying kinetics, energy efficiency, rehydration behavior, and sensory attributes of soaked and cooked chickpeas using a solar-assisted forced convection system under varying air temperatures (50–80 °C) and airflow rates (118.02–478.54 kg/h). Results showed that soaked chickpeas dried faster (4.0–17.5 h) and required less energy than cooked chickpeas (6–21 h), with solar energy contributing up to 50% of the total requirement under favorable conditions. Specific energy consumption increased with airflow rate but declined at higher drying temperatures, indicating that optimal performance occurred at elevated temperature and reduced airflow. Rehydration studies revealed that cooked chickpeas achieved slightly higher rehydration ratios and moisture regain due to structural modifications during cooking, while soaked chickpeas demonstrated satisfactory reconstitution ability with lower energy demand. Sensory evaluation indicated that moderate drying conditions (50–60 °C, 0.50–0.75 m/s airflow) yielded the most acceptable products. Soaked chickpeas were preferred for color and taste, while cooked chickpeas scored better in texture and overall mouthfeel. Overall, solar-assisted drying proved effective for producing energy-efficient, rehydratable chickpea products with desirable sensory quality. The results suggest that soaked chickpeas are more suitable for energy-optimized processing, whereas cooked chickpeas may be preferred when superior rehydration and textural properties are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agricultural Products Processing and Storage
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44462-025-00049-x
Primary Topic
Food Drying and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainable solar assisted drying of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a comparative study on energy use, rehydration and sensory attributes

P.N. Sarsavadia, Krishna Vaja, U. D. Dobariya, Devanand Gojiya
Agricultural Products Processing and Storage
Food Drying and Modeling
article

Sustainable solar assisted drying of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a comparative study on energy use, rehydration and sensory attributes

P.N. Sarsavadia, Krishna Vaja, U. D. Dobariya, Devanand Gojiya
article en

Abstract

Drying chickpeas to produce ready to reconstitute products offers a sustainable approach to improving their convenience and utilization. However, drying is energy-intensive, and optimization is essential for both efficiency and product quality. This study investigated the drying kinetics, energy efficiency, rehydration behavior, and sensory attributes of soaked and cooked chickpeas using a solar-assisted forced convection system under varying air temperatures (50–80 °C) and airflow rates (118.02–478.54 kg/h). Results showed that soaked chickpeas dried faster (4.0–17.5 h) and required less energy than cooked chickpeas (6–21 h), with solar energy contributing up to 50% of the total requirement under favorable conditions. Specific energy consumption increased with airflow rate but declined at higher drying temperatures, indicating that optimal performance occurred at elevated temperature and reduced airflow. Rehydration studies revealed that cooked chickpeas achieved slightly higher rehydration ratios and moisture regain due to structural modifications during cooking, while soaked chickpeas demonstrated satisfactory reconstitution ability with lower energy demand. Sensory evaluation indicated that moderate drying conditions (50–60 °C, 0.50–0.75 m/s airflow) yielded the most acceptable products. Soaked chickpeas were preferred for color and taste, while cooked chickpeas scored better in texture and overall mouthfeel. Overall, solar-assisted drying proved effective for producing energy-efficient, rehydratable chickpea products with desirable sensory quality. The results suggest that soaked chickpeas are more suitable for energy-optimized processing, whereas cooked chickpeas may be preferred when superior rehydration and textural properties are required.

Agricultural Products Processing and StorageVol. 2(1)
Junagadh Agricultural University (IN), Sardarkrushinagar Dantiwada Agricultural University (IN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Food Drying and Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.