Objectivity and objectification. On the ethics and epistemologies of skin colour measurements in the social sciences

• Instruments like skin colour scales and colorimeters are increasingly used in American social science studies addressing issues of racism and social inequalities. • It is crucial to consider the ethical dimensions of measuring skin colour, due to the ever-present risks of objectifying skin colour and reifying social conceptions of ‘race’. • Historically, problems of objectification are tightly linked to approaches that emphasize the search for ‘objective’ ways to quantify bodily traits like skin colour. • Feminist and antiracist standpoints offer useful ethical and epistemic resources for anticipating and mitigating the risks of objectification at different moments in the research process: instrument design, data collection, and science communication. • It is not always obvious what is meant by ‘objective’ measures of skin colour in contemporary social science contexts, and clarifying what objectivity means in specific research contexts can help scientists design more appropriate and ethical methodologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2025.102112
Primary Topic
Race, Genetics, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objectivity and objectification. On the ethics and epistemologies of skin colour measurements in the social sciences

Sarah Abel
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
Race, Genetics, and Society
article

Objectivity and objectification. On the ethics and epistemologies of skin colour measurements in the social sciences

Sarah Abel
article en

Abstract

• Instruments like skin colour scales and colorimeters are increasingly used in American social science studies addressing issues of racism and social inequalities. • It is crucial to consider the ethical dimensions of measuring skin colour, due to the ever-present risks of objectifying skin colour and reifying social conceptions of ‘race’. • Historically, problems of objectification are tightly linked to approaches that emphasize the search for ‘objective’ ways to quantify bodily traits like skin colour. • Feminist and antiracist standpoints offer useful ethical and epistemic resources for anticipating and mitigating the risks of objectification at different moments in the research process: instrument design, data collection, and science communication. • It is not always obvious what is meant by ‘objective’ measures of skin colour in contemporary social science contexts, and clarifying what objectivity means in specific research contexts can help scientists design more appropriate and ethical methodologies.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part AVol. 115
Instituto de Filosofía (ES)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Race, Genetics, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.