Interpretation of the Avoidance-endurance Fast-screen Questionnaire

The current study identified potential issues with participants' interpretation of three items. However, as interviews may be prone to the influence of social desirability bias, the interpretation of the results for item 4, where the most frequent non-congruent interpretation of making a fuss was equal to lack of pain validation, is done with caution. Therefore, a revision is suggested with reformulation of item 6 and removal of item 1, which, however, will require validation in future research.