Learning to let go: Transformations in teachers’ pedagogical reasoning about classroom discussion

While teacher education researchers debate whether organizing teacher learning opportunities around practices sidelines pedagogical reasoning, limited empirical research has investigated this concern. Using video stimulated recall interviews (VSRI) with grades 4–8 literacy teachers across their engagement in a two-year, practice-based, professional development (PBPD) program focused on facilitating text-based discussions, this study investigates teachers' pedagogical reasoning. Findings indicate that while teachers' PBPD was anchored in practices, teachers’ instructional goals went through striking shifts alongside their practices. The most striking shift was in the goals that teachers abandoned, rather than the ones they adopted. Results suggest that focusing on practices does not necessarily displace a focus on purposes. Highlights • Teacher goals and strategies change over time. • Teacher PD can lead to both the adoption and abandonment of strategies. • Teachers benefit from focusing on one practice over time. • Study informs design of PD that supports teacher decision-making, not just technique. • Study speaks to the importance of scaffolded reflection and professional dialogue in teacher professional learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Teaching and Teacher Education
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105372
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning to let go: Transformations in teachers’ pedagogical reasoning about classroom discussion

Sarah Schneider Kavanagh, Elizabeth Schiavone Gotwalt, Katie A. Danielson
Teaching and Teacher Education
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
article

Learning to let go: Transformations in teachers’ pedagogical reasoning about classroom discussion

Sarah Schneider Kavanagh, Elizabeth Schiavone Gotwalt, Katie A. Danielson
article en

Abstract

While teacher education researchers debate whether organizing teacher learning opportunities around practices sidelines pedagogical reasoning, limited empirical research has investigated this concern. Using video stimulated recall interviews (VSRI) with grades 4–8 literacy teachers across their engagement in a two-year, practice-based, professional development (PBPD) program focused on facilitating text-based discussions, this study investigates teachers' pedagogical reasoning. Findings indicate that while teachers' PBPD was anchored in practices, teachers’ instructional goals went through striking shifts alongside their practices. The most striking shift was in the goals that teachers abandoned, rather than the ones they adopted. Results suggest that focusing on practices does not necessarily displace a focus on purposes. Highlights • Teacher goals and strategies change over time. • Teacher PD can lead to both the adoption and abandonment of strategies. • Teachers benefit from focusing on one practice over time. • Study informs design of PD that supports teacher decision-making, not just technique. • Study speaks to the importance of scaffolded reflection and professional dialogue in teacher professional learning.

Teaching and Teacher EducationVol. 172
California University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Portland (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.