Comparative Analysis to Determine the State of Charge of a Lithium‐Ion Cell

Accurate state of charge (SOC) estimation remains a challenge in lithium‐ion battery management systems (BMSs) due to the cells’ complex, nonlinear internal dynamics, and their high sensitivity to operating conditions. While most existing data‐driven studies rely on a core input configuration of voltage ( V ), current ( I ), and temperature ( T ), these models often struggle with temperature‐induced variations, which typically require complex architectures. This study addresses the challenge of thermal dependency through an innovative feature engineering approach designed to maintain a low computational cost suitable for real‐time applications. Recognizing that internal resistance ( R ) inherently reflects both the cell’s temperature and aging state, we propose replacing T with R as the third input feature, resulting in an [I, V, R] configuration. We systematically compared the performance of four estimation models: DE‐long short‐term memory (LSTM), DE‐gated recurrent unit (GRU), LSTM‐unscented Kalman filter (UKF), and GRU‐UKF, using both the traditional [ I , V , T ] and the proposed [ I , V , R ] input sets. The results validate the superiority of the R ‐based configuration, which led to significant reductions in mean absolute error (MAE) by 46.02%, 43.31%, 14.02%, and 35.85%, and in root mean square error (RMSE) by 48.95%, 39.87%, 21.90%, and 23.95% for the DE‐LSTM, DE‐GRU, LSTM‐UKF, and GRU‐UKF models, respectively. This confirms that substituting T with R captures nonlinear temperature and aging effects more effectively while maintaining low computational complexity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy Research
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/er/6116851
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis to Determine the State of Charge of a Lithium‐Ion Cell

Emanuèle Ogliari, Spyridon Giazitzis, Mohamed Louzazni, Hafsa Khayrane et al.
International Journal of Energy Research
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
article

Comparative Analysis to Determine the State of Charge of a Lithium‐Ion Cell

Emanuèle Ogliari, Spyridon Giazitzis, Mohamed Louzazni, Hafsa Khayrane, Marco Mussetta
article en

Abstract

Accurate state of charge (SOC) estimation remains a challenge in lithium‐ion battery management systems (BMSs) due to the cells’ complex, nonlinear internal dynamics, and their high sensitivity to operating conditions. While most existing data‐driven studies rely on a core input configuration of voltage ( V ), current ( I ), and temperature ( T ), these models often struggle with temperature‐induced variations, which typically require complex architectures. This study addresses the challenge of thermal dependency through an innovative feature engineering approach designed to maintain a low computational cost suitable for real‐time applications. Recognizing that internal resistance ( R ) inherently reflects both the cell’s temperature and aging state, we propose replacing T with R as the third input feature, resulting in an [I, V, R] configuration. We systematically compared the performance of four estimation models: DE‐long short‐term memory (LSTM), DE‐gated recurrent unit (GRU), LSTM‐unscented Kalman filter (UKF), and GRU‐UKF, using both the traditional [ I , V , T ] and the proposed [ I , V , R ] input sets. The results validate the superiority of the R ‐based configuration, which led to significant reductions in mean absolute error (MAE) by 46.02%, 43.31%, 14.02%, and 35.85%, and in root mean square error (RMSE) by 48.95%, 39.87%, 21.90%, and 23.95% for the DE‐LSTM, DE‐GRU, LSTM‐UKF, and GRU‐UKF models, respectively. This confirms that substituting T with R captures nonlinear temperature and aging effects more effectively while maintaining low computational complexity.

International Journal of Energy ResearchVol. 2026(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Advanced Battery Technologies Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.