Staying inside the bubble: the unequal consequences of limiting weak ties during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract A worldwide consequence of COVID-19 was the limitation placed on the creation and maintenance of social contacts outside household boundaries. Based on narrative interviews with 690 individuals across 30 European countries, this paper explores how people experienced such pandemic-related changes to their social relations. Distinguishing between strong and weak ties, the analysis shows that while acts of solidarity were performed during the pandemic, they usually relied on strong ties as they were bound in some way, e.g., limited to a close group of friends and family, the neighbourhood, or based around a shared group identity. Those outside these boundaries were left without support, and weak ties in the form of ‘bridges’ connecting different communities were mostly absent. The paper argues that because weak ties were strongly discouraged during the pandemic, the exclusionary power of social capital was reinforced, and social networks became more fragmented, potentially affecting social cohesion negatively in the post-pandemic period as well.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06458-4
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Staying inside the bubble: the unequal consequences of limiting weak ties during the COVID-19 pandemic

Lina Sandström
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Social Capital and Networks
article

Staying inside the bubble: the unequal consequences of limiting weak ties during the COVID-19 pandemic

Lina Sandström
article en

Abstract

Abstract A worldwide consequence of COVID-19 was the limitation placed on the creation and maintenance of social contacts outside household boundaries. Based on narrative interviews with 690 individuals across 30 European countries, this paper explores how people experienced such pandemic-related changes to their social relations. Distinguishing between strong and weak ties, the analysis shows that while acts of solidarity were performed during the pandemic, they usually relied on strong ties as they were bound in some way, e.g., limited to a close group of friends and family, the neighbourhood, or based around a shared group identity. Those outside these boundaries were left without support, and weak ties in the form of ‘bridges’ connecting different communities were mostly absent. The paper argues that because weak ties were strongly discouraged during the pandemic, the exclusionary power of social capital was reinforced, and social networks became more fragmented, potentially affecting social cohesion negatively in the post-pandemic period as well.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 13(1)
Örebro University (SE)
European Commission, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Social Capital and Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Staying inside the bubble: the unequal consequences of limiting weak ties during the COVID-19 pandemic — Lina Sandström · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS