Cartographic privacy: Case studies in communicating sensitive geospatial information

Numerous quantitative techniques exist for protecting geoprivacy, but often require significant expertise and may not always provide adequate protection. We propose cartographic privacy as a framework for protecting sensitive spatial data. Cartographically private approaches favor using design techniques to obfuscate data rather than statistical ones, appealing to intuitive rather than technical understandings of geoprivacy. We explore this concept using two case studies of sensitive geonarrative interviews that focus on mapping the topology and friction of trajectories described by participants, and in doing so protect geoprivacy. We conclude by discussing the advantages and disadvantages of qualitatively driven approaches to geoprivacy protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Progress in Human Geography
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325251413610
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cartographic privacy: Case studies in communicating sensitive geospatial information

David Swanlund, Mariana Jose Brussoni, Nadine Schuurman, Michael Martin
Progress in Human Geography
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
article

Cartographic privacy: Case studies in communicating sensitive geospatial information

David Swanlund, Mariana Jose Brussoni, Nadine Schuurman, Michael Martin
article en

Abstract

Numerous quantitative techniques exist for protecting geoprivacy, but often require significant expertise and may not always provide adequate protection. We propose cartographic privacy as a framework for protecting sensitive spatial data. Cartographically private approaches favor using design techniques to obfuscate data rather than statistical ones, appealing to intuitive rather than technical understandings of geoprivacy. We explore this concept using two case studies of sensitive geonarrative interviews that focus on mapping the topology and friction of trajectories described by participants, and in doing so protect geoprivacy. We conclude by discussing the advantages and disadvantages of qualitatively driven approaches to geoprivacy protection.

Progress in Human Geography
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Auckland (NZ), Simon Fraser University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cartographic privacy: Case studies in communicating sensitive geospatial information — David Swanlund, Mariana Jose Brussoni, et al. · Progress in Human Geography (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS