Validation of the BEST-J score and identification of bile reflux as a risk factor for delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality globally. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has improved survival rates for early gastric cancer (EGC), but complications such as delayed bleeding remain a concern. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to validate the BEST-J prediction model for post-ESD bleeding in two Beijing hospitals and identify additional risk factors influencing this complication. We analyzed data from 688 patients who underwent ESD for EGC across two institutions. Patient demographics, procedural details, and comorbidities were collected. The BEST-J score was calculated for each patient, and Firth’s penalized logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for delayed bleeding. Our findings revealed that the BEST-J score had limited discriminative power in predicting post-ESD bleeding (AUC = 0.583). However, two independent risk factors—previous cerebral infarction (p = 0.012) and bile reflux (p = 0.012)—were significantly associated with delayed bleeding. This study underscores the necessity for ongoing validation of predictive models such as BEST-J, particularly across different populations. The identification of cerebral infarction and bile reflux as significant predictors highlights the need to integrate additional factors into risk assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04575-7
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the BEST-J score and identification of bile reflux as a risk factor for delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Wenbin Liao, Q. Wang, Yingyun Yang, Siyang Fu et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Validation of the BEST-J score and identification of bile reflux as a risk factor for delayed bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection

Wenbin Liao, Q. Wang, Yingyun Yang, Siyang Fu, L Zou, Aiming Yang, Jihua Shi
article en

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality globally. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has improved survival rates for early gastric cancer (EGC), but complications such as delayed bleeding remain a concern. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to validate the BEST-J prediction model for post-ESD bleeding in two Beijing hospitals and identify additional risk factors influencing this complication. We analyzed data from 688 patients who underwent ESD for EGC across two institutions. Patient demographics, procedural details, and comorbidities were collected. The BEST-J score was calculated for each patient, and Firth’s penalized logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for delayed bleeding. Our findings revealed that the BEST-J score had limited discriminative power in predicting post-ESD bleeding (AUC = 0.583). However, two independent risk factors—previous cerebral infarction (p = 0.012) and bile reflux (p = 0.012)—were significantly associated with delayed bleeding. This study underscores the necessity for ongoing validation of predictive models such as BEST-J, particularly across different populations. The identification of cerebral infarction and bile reflux as significant predictors highlights the need to integrate additional factors into risk assessments.

BMC GastroenterologyVol. 26(1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN), Beijing Hospital (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.