Physics-based simulations of the foreshock and aftershock of the February 6, 2023 Turkiye earthquakes and ground motion validation

This study presents the first three-dimensional (3D) physics-based ground motion simulations conducted for southern Turkiye, focusing on the foreshocks and aftershocks associated with the February 6, 2023 Turkiye earthquake sequence. The simulations were performed using a fourth-order staggered-grid finite-difference method developed for elastic media, incorporating a point-source double-couple representation to model rupture processes. Moderate-magnitude earthquakes were selected to enable the investigation of site-specific effects with reduced influence from the complex source characteristics typically associated with large events and from nonlinear behavior of near-surface soils. Accordingly, a regional-scale velocity model was constructed to capture both the source locations of these events and the dense strong-motion observation network covering Kahramanmaraş, Gaziantep, Türkoğlu, Nurdağı, and Pazarcık. The simulation results for both the Nurdağı (Gaziantep) Mw 4.5 aftershock on February 19, 2023 and the Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş) Mw 4.5 foreshock on October 20, 2022 are analyzed by incorporating variations in the deep crustal velocity structure and low-velocity shallow sedimentary layers, with shear-wave velocities as low as 800 m/s. Simulated ground motions were compared with observed strong-motion records, and validation was carried out using a comprehensive set of intensity and frequency-based ground motion metrics. These included waveform similarity, Arias duration, energy duration, Arias intensity, energy integral, peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground displacement (PGD), response spectra, and Fourier amplitude spectra, following the quantitative fit scoring methodology based on synthetic-to-observed motion comparison metrics proposed by Anderson (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 2004). Strong-motion recordings were largely consistent with the simulations, with intensity-based fit scores predominantly in the 6–8 range and coherent response spectrum residuals in the 1–10 s period band, demonstrating the reliability of the results up to 1.0 Hz for long-period ground-motion assessment and for resolving contributions from both shallow and deep structural features. The study highlights the critical importance of capturing irregular wave propagation patterns shaped by regional stratigraphy and sedimentary basin configurations. Overall, the research provides essential methodological and modeling infrastructure to improve seismic hazard assessment and support resilient infrastructure planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-025-02360-1
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-based simulations of the foreshock and aftershock of the February 6, 2023 Turkiye earthquakes and ground motion validation

Bilal Özaslan, Seiji Tsuno, Nobuyuki Yamada, Hiroaki Yamanaka
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Physics-based simulations of the foreshock and aftershock of the February 6, 2023 Turkiye earthquakes and ground motion validation

Bilal Özaslan, Seiji Tsuno, Nobuyuki Yamada, Hiroaki Yamanaka
article en

Abstract

This study presents the first three-dimensional (3D) physics-based ground motion simulations conducted for southern Turkiye, focusing on the foreshocks and aftershocks associated with the February 6, 2023 Turkiye earthquake sequence. The simulations were performed using a fourth-order staggered-grid finite-difference method developed for elastic media, incorporating a point-source double-couple representation to model rupture processes. Moderate-magnitude earthquakes were selected to enable the investigation of site-specific effects with reduced influence from the complex source characteristics typically associated with large events and from nonlinear behavior of near-surface soils. Accordingly, a regional-scale velocity model was constructed to capture both the source locations of these events and the dense strong-motion observation network covering Kahramanmaraş, Gaziantep, Türkoğlu, Nurdağı, and Pazarcık. The simulation results for both the Nurdağı (Gaziantep) Mw 4.5 aftershock on February 19, 2023 and the Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş) Mw 4.5 foreshock on October 20, 2022 are analyzed by incorporating variations in the deep crustal velocity structure and low-velocity shallow sedimentary layers, with shear-wave velocities as low as 800 m/s. Simulated ground motions were compared with observed strong-motion records, and validation was carried out using a comprehensive set of intensity and frequency-based ground motion metrics. These included waveform similarity, Arias duration, energy duration, Arias intensity, energy integral, peak ground acceleration (PGA), peak ground velocity (PGV), peak ground displacement (PGD), response spectra, and Fourier amplitude spectra, following the quantitative fit scoring methodology based on synthetic-to-observed motion comparison metrics proposed by Anderson (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 2004). Strong-motion recordings were largely consistent with the simulations, with intensity-based fit scores predominantly in the 6–8 range and coherent response spectrum residuals in the 1–10 s period band, demonstrating the reliability of the results up to 1.0 Hz for long-period ground-motion assessment and for resolving contributions from both shallow and deep structural features. The study highlights the critical importance of capturing irregular wave propagation patterns shaped by regional stratigraphy and sedimentary basin configurations. Overall, the research provides essential methodological and modeling infrastructure to improve seismic hazard assessment and support resilient infrastructure planning.

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP), University of Kochi (JP), Ahi Evran University (TR), Kōchi University (JP)
Strong
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.