Stable high-yield pearl millet genotypes identified from global germplasm through AMMI, GGE, and stability index approaches

Context Pearl millet, a climate-resilient, nutrient-rich cereal, faces productivity challenges from environmental variability, necessitating identification of stable, high-yielding genotypes. Aims This study aimed to identify stable, high-yielding pearl millet to achieve increased grain yield per hectare (GYPH), spike length (SL), spike girth (SG), and thousand-seed weight (TSW) from a global germplasm collection of 248 pearl millet genotypes. Methods Field trials were conducted in an alpha lattice design with three replications across three environments. Genotype stability and performance were assessed using additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype main effect plus genotype-by-environment interaction (GGE) biplot analyses. Stability indices (AMMI-based stability parameter (ASTAB), AMMI stability index (ASI), AMMI stability value (ASV), modified AMMI stability index (MASI), and modified AMMI stability value (MASV)) were integrated to quantitatively assess the stable genotypes. Key results The first two AMMI principal components explained 55% and 45% of the total variation for GYPH, whereas GGE biplots explained 84.99%, 88.89%, 77.7%, and 83.17% for GYPH, SL, SG, and TSW respectively. AMMI identified G57, G101, and G209 as stable for GYPH, whereas GGE selected G87, G242, G246, and G131. The genotype selection index (GSI) highlighted G87, G209, G242, G143, and G172 as highly stable for GYPH. Stable genotypes were also identified for SL (G57, G246, G140), SG (G218, G157, G8), and TSW (G57, G95, G149). Conclusions The integrated assessment of stability using multiple approaches was shown to be effective in identifying stable genotypes across diverse environments. Notably, G87 emerged as the most stable genotype for GYPH. Implications Integrating stable genotypes into breeding programs could enhance yield stability, disease resistance, and grain quality, ensuring adaptability across environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop and Pasture Science
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/cp25078
Primary Topic
Genetics and Plant Breeding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stable high-yield pearl millet genotypes identified from global germplasm through AMMI, GGE, and stability index approaches

Chandan Kapoor, Tripti Singhal, P. Supriya, Sunaina Yadav et al.
Crop and Pasture Science
Genetics and Plant Breeding
article

Stable high-yield pearl millet genotypes identified from global germplasm through AMMI, GGE, and stability index approaches

Chandan Kapoor, Tripti Singhal, P. Supriya, Sunaina Yadav, Naveen Aavula, Chellapilla Tara Satyavathi, HEMANTH S, Anamika Sharma, Nirupma Singh, Sanjana Reddy, Sumer Pal Singh
article en

Abstract

Context Pearl millet, a climate-resilient, nutrient-rich cereal, faces productivity challenges from environmental variability, necessitating identification of stable, high-yielding genotypes. Aims This study aimed to identify stable, high-yielding pearl millet to achieve increased grain yield per hectare (GYPH), spike length (SL), spike girth (SG), and thousand-seed weight (TSW) from a global germplasm collection of 248 pearl millet genotypes. Methods Field trials were conducted in an alpha lattice design with three replications across three environments. Genotype stability and performance were assessed using additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and genotype main effect plus genotype-by-environment interaction (GGE) biplot analyses. Stability indices (AMMI-based stability parameter (ASTAB), AMMI stability index (ASI), AMMI stability value (ASV), modified AMMI stability index (MASI), and modified AMMI stability value (MASV)) were integrated to quantitatively assess the stable genotypes. Key results The first two AMMI principal components explained 55% and 45% of the total variation for GYPH, whereas GGE biplots explained 84.99%, 88.89%, 77.7%, and 83.17% for GYPH, SL, SG, and TSW respectively. AMMI identified G57, G101, and G209 as stable for GYPH, whereas GGE selected G87, G242, G246, and G131. The genotype selection index (GSI) highlighted G87, G209, G242, G143, and G172 as highly stable for GYPH. Stable genotypes were also identified for SL (G57, G246, G140), SG (G218, G157, G8), and TSW (G57, G95, G149). Conclusions The integrated assessment of stability using multiple approaches was shown to be effective in identifying stable genotypes across diverse environments. Notably, G87 emerged as the most stable genotype for GYPH. Implications Integrating stable genotypes into breeding programs could enhance yield stability, disease resistance, and grain quality, ensuring adaptability across environments.

Crop and Pasture ScienceVol. 77(3)
Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN), Indian Institute of Millets Research (IN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Genetics and Plant Breeding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.