Energy Subsidies and the Climate Dilemma in Middle Eastern Petro-States: An Empirical Analysis

This study examines the link between fossil fuel subsidies and greenhouse gas emissions in five major Middle Eastern petro-states: Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, which face a severe dilemma as they weigh the imperative of addressing climate change against their economic reliance on fossil fuels. Covering the period 2010–2023, the analysis estimates the elasticity of emissions with respect to total and fuel-specific subsidies. The results indicate a robust and statistically significant positive association between subsidies and emissions, with a 10 percent reduction in total subsidies corresponding to a 1.2 percent decline in emissions. Among fuel types, gas subsidies show the strongest and most consistent correlation with emissions, while oil and electricity subsidies exhibit weaker or statistically insignificant patterns. The findings highlight the environmental relevance of fuel-specific subsidy reforms and provide an empirical foundation for evaluating policy pathways that balance fiscal sustainability, social welfare, and emission-reduction objectives in the region.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.24946
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy Subsidies and the Climate Dilemma in Middle Eastern Petro-States: An Empirical Analysis

Alireza Eshraghi
1 links
International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
article

Energy Subsidies and the Climate Dilemma in Middle Eastern Petro-States: An Empirical Analysis

Alireza Eshraghi
article en

Abstract

This study examines the link between fossil fuel subsidies and greenhouse gas emissions in five major Middle Eastern petro-states: Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, which face a severe dilemma as they weigh the imperative of addressing climate change against their economic reliance on fossil fuels. Covering the period 2010–2023, the analysis estimates the elasticity of emissions with respect to total and fuel-specific subsidies. The results indicate a robust and statistically significant positive association between subsidies and emissions, with a 10 percent reduction in total subsidies corresponding to a 1.2 percent decline in emissions. Among fuel types, gas subsidies show the strongest and most consistent correlation with emissions, while oil and electricity subsidies exhibit weaker or statistically insignificant patterns. The findings highlight the environmental relevance of fuel-specific subsidy reforms and provide an empirical foundation for evaluating policy pathways that balance fiscal sustainability, social welfare, and emission-reduction objectives in the region.

International Journal of Energy Economics and PolicyVol. 16(6)
Climate action, Affordable and clean energy, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Energy Subsidies and the Climate Dilemma in Middle Eastern Petro-States: An Empirical Analysis — Alireza Eshraghi · International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS