Establishing reference standards for small and diminutive colorectal polyp size: validation of caliper-based size measurement

Abstract Background and Aim Accurate measurement of resected colorectal polyps is essential for clinical management, research, and the development of artificial intelligence-based size estimation systems. Despite widespread use of caliper-based measurement for specimen sizing, formal validation against a reference standard is lacking. This study aimed to validate caliper-based measurement of resected small and diminutive colorectal polyps against high-resolution digital microscopy, a previously validated reference method. Methods At the Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 143 polyps from 92 patients were measured immediately after resection using vernier digital calipers in the endoscopy suite. Independent measurements were subsequently obtained using high-resolution digital microscopy under blinded conditions. Agreement between methods was assessed using bias analysis, Bland-Altman limits of agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and categorical size concordance. Results Caliper-based measurements demonstrated a mean bias of −0.22 mm (95% CI: −0.34 to −0.11; P < .001) relative to the reference standard. The noninferiority hypothesis with a 0.5-mm margin was not rejected (lower 95% CI > −0.5 mm). Bland-Altman’s limits of agreement were −1.57 to 1.12 mm, and the ICC was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92). Correct categorical classification occurred in 94.4% of cases (95% CI: 0.89-0.97; κ = 0.81). Conclusion Caliper-based measurement provides accurate and reproducible estimates of polyp size when compared with digital microscopy, supporting its use for clinical and research applications requiring direct specimen measurement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaf039
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Establishing reference standards for small and diminutive colorectal polyp size: validation of caliper-based size measurement

Roupen Djinbachian, Linda Scavo, D von Renteln, Mickaël Bouin et al.
1 citations
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
article

Establishing reference standards for small and diminutive colorectal polyp size: validation of caliper-based size measurement

Roupen Djinbachian, Linda Scavo, D von Renteln, Mickaël Bouin, Dane Christina Daoud, Simon Bouchard, Victoire Michal, R Battat, Jeremy Liu Chen Kiow, Preslava Aleksieva, Benoît Panzini, Megan Oleksiw, Eric Cristea, Mohamed Zineddine Mahdadi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aim Accurate measurement of resected colorectal polyps is essential for clinical management, research, and the development of artificial intelligence-based size estimation systems. Despite widespread use of caliper-based measurement for specimen sizing, formal validation against a reference standard is lacking. This study aimed to validate caliper-based measurement of resected small and diminutive colorectal polyps against high-resolution digital microscopy, a previously validated reference method. Methods At the Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, 143 polyps from 92 patients were measured immediately after resection using vernier digital calipers in the endoscopy suite. Independent measurements were subsequently obtained using high-resolution digital microscopy under blinded conditions. Agreement between methods was assessed using bias analysis, Bland-Altman limits of agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and categorical size concordance. Results Caliper-based measurements demonstrated a mean bias of −0.22 mm (95% CI: −0.34 to −0.11; P < .001) relative to the reference standard. The noninferiority hypothesis with a 0.5-mm margin was not rejected (lower 95% CI > −0.5 mm). Bland-Altman’s limits of agreement were −1.57 to 1.12 mm, and the ICC was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92). Correct categorical classification occurred in 94.4% of cases (95% CI: 0.89-0.97; κ = 0.81). Conclusion Caliper-based measurement provides accurate and reproducible estimates of polyp size when compared with digital microscopy, supporting its use for clinical and research applications requiring direct specimen measurement.

Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.