Rashi and Ibn Ezra in Naḥmanides’s Early Writing

Abstract Moses Naḥmanides’s complex relationship in his commentary to the Torah with the two great Jewish Bible commentators who preceded him—Rashi and Ibn Ezra—is well known. As he declares in the introductory poem to the commentary, he does not treat them equally. He grants Rashi “the right of the first-born,” relegating Ibn Ezra to second place, and that his relationship with Ibn Ezra will be far more fraught—one of “open rebuke and hidden love.” This article maintains, however, that neither Naḥmanides’s stated preference for Rashi nor his sharp criticism of Ibn Ezra reflects his original exegetical stance. At the outset of his interpretive career, it was in fact Ibn Ezra who commanded Naḥmanides’s special admiration. Ibn Ezra’s commentary—not Rashi’s—served as the point of departure for Naḥmanides’s earliest exegetical work. Rashi’s influence entered Naḥmanides’s corpus only gradually, forming part of the larger cultural transformation he experienced as his intellectual orientation shifted from Andalusia to northern France.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jewish History
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10835-025-09481-9
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rashi and Ibn Ezra in Naḥmanides’s Early Writing

Arie Copperman
Jewish History
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
article

Rashi and Ibn Ezra in Naḥmanides’s Early Writing

Arie Copperman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Moses Naḥmanides’s complex relationship in his commentary to the Torah with the two great Jewish Bible commentators who preceded him—Rashi and Ibn Ezra—is well known. As he declares in the introductory poem to the commentary, he does not treat them equally. He grants Rashi “the right of the first-born,” relegating Ibn Ezra to second place, and that his relationship with Ibn Ezra will be far more fraught—one of “open rebuke and hidden love.” This article maintains, however, that neither Naḥmanides’s stated preference for Rashi nor his sharp criticism of Ibn Ezra reflects his original exegetical stance. At the outset of his interpretive career, it was in fact Ibn Ezra who commanded Naḥmanides’s special admiration. Ibn Ezra’s commentary—not Rashi’s—served as the point of departure for Naḥmanides’s earliest exegetical work. Rashi’s influence entered Naḥmanides’s corpus only gradually, forming part of the larger cultural transformation he experienced as his intellectual orientation shifted from Andalusia to northern France.

Jewish HistoryVol. 39(3-4)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Rashi and Ibn Ezra in Naḥmanides’s Early Writing — Arie Copperman · Jewish History (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS