Faculty Perceptions of their Disciplinary Cultures: Re-Evaluating Biglan’s Dimensions

Abstract For fifty years, the Biglan dimensions have been frequently relied on by researchers interested in considering disciplinary differences as parts of their studies; however, applying a cultural lens draws attention to the possibility that over time, disciplinary cultures may have changed. This exploratory study examined faculty perceptions of their disciplinary cultures by adding an item set derived from common definitions and descriptors of Biglan’s dimensions onto the 2022 Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE). For 680 faculty at four-year colleges and universities, across 98 disciplines, results indicated that our items formed three scales of disciplinary cultures – Consensus, Pure Scholarship, and Life Systems – that align with Biglan’s dimensions. Faculty perceptions of their disciplinary cultures showed considerable variation across all three scales and disciplinary means and clusters do not necessarily align with how disciplines would be categorized using the Biglan dimensions. Our findings suggest the possibility that the cultures of some disciplines have evolved and that scholars should exercise caution in how they interpret dichotomous or categorical applications of Biglan’s dimensions to understanding faculty work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Higher Education
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-025-09875-1
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Faculty Perceptions of their Disciplinary Cultures: Re-Evaluating Biglan’s Dimensions

Thomas Nelson Laird, Emily Braught, Stephen C. Hiller, Allison BrckaLorenz
Research in Higher Education
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

Faculty Perceptions of their Disciplinary Cultures: Re-Evaluating Biglan’s Dimensions

Thomas Nelson Laird, Emily Braught, Stephen C. Hiller, Allison BrckaLorenz
article en

Abstract

Abstract For fifty years, the Biglan dimensions have been frequently relied on by researchers interested in considering disciplinary differences as parts of their studies; however, applying a cultural lens draws attention to the possibility that over time, disciplinary cultures may have changed. This exploratory study examined faculty perceptions of their disciplinary cultures by adding an item set derived from common definitions and descriptors of Biglan’s dimensions onto the 2022 Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE). For 680 faculty at four-year colleges and universities, across 98 disciplines, results indicated that our items formed three scales of disciplinary cultures – Consensus, Pure Scholarship, and Life Systems – that align with Biglan’s dimensions. Faculty perceptions of their disciplinary cultures showed considerable variation across all three scales and disciplinary means and clusters do not necessarily align with how disciplines would be categorized using the Biglan dimensions. Our findings suggest the possibility that the cultures of some disciplines have evolved and that scholars should exercise caution in how they interpret dichotomous or categorical applications of Biglan’s dimensions to understanding faculty work.

Research in Higher EducationVol. 67(1)
Indiana University Bloomington (US), Indiana University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Faculty Perceptions of their Disciplinary Cultures: Re-Evaluating Biglan’s Dimensions — Thomas Nelson Laird, Emily Braught, et al. · Research in Higher Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS