The Markov switching model on early warning in banking vulnerability: comparison between Indonesia and Malaysia

Purpose This research paper aims to analyze the fluctuating instability of Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia by identifying early warning signs of banking crises, determining the lengthiest crisis durations and evaluating the stability of Islamic banking in both nations. Design/methodology/approach Using the z-score to measure banking stability, this research examines data points spanning from January 2007 to August 2022, using the Markov Switching Vector Autoregression (MS-VAR) method to identify changes in economic circumstances. Findings Findings show Malaysia is more stable, while Indonesia experiences shorter crisis periods. Key factors such as credit, exchange rate, debt, foreign rates and money supply raise the probability of a crisis in both countries. Some variables are not consistently significant, highlighting different stability drivers. The results suggest that tailored risk management is needed in dual banking systems. Research limitations/implications This study is limited by its use of the Z-score as the sole proxy for banking stability, which may not capture all dimensions of financial soundness. Additionally, the analysis focuses only on Indonesia and Malaysia, limiting the generalizability of the findings. Future research should consider alternative or multiple stability indicators and include a broader set of countries for more comprehensive insights. Practical implications The findings highlight the need for stable and proactive regulation in managing Islamic banking risks. Policymakers should strengthen macroprudential oversight, monitor key risk factors and support Islamic banks through capital buffers and risk-sharing instruments to enhance resilience during crises. Originality/value This study contributes to the limited literature comparing Islamic banking stability across countries, particularly in Southeast Asia, using a dynamic econometric approach to capture cyclical fluctuations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-09-2024-0362
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Markov switching model on early warning in banking vulnerability: comparison between Indonesia and Malaysia

Irfan Nurfalah, Aam Slamet Rusydiana, Ririn Riani
Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

The Markov switching model on early warning in banking vulnerability: comparison between Indonesia and Malaysia

Irfan Nurfalah, Aam Slamet Rusydiana, Ririn Riani
article en

Abstract

Purpose This research paper aims to analyze the fluctuating instability of Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia by identifying early warning signs of banking crises, determining the lengthiest crisis durations and evaluating the stability of Islamic banking in both nations. Design/methodology/approach Using the z-score to measure banking stability, this research examines data points spanning from January 2007 to August 2022, using the Markov Switching Vector Autoregression (MS-VAR) method to identify changes in economic circumstances. Findings Findings show Malaysia is more stable, while Indonesia experiences shorter crisis periods. Key factors such as credit, exchange rate, debt, foreign rates and money supply raise the probability of a crisis in both countries. Some variables are not consistently significant, highlighting different stability drivers. The results suggest that tailored risk management is needed in dual banking systems. Research limitations/implications This study is limited by its use of the Z-score as the sole proxy for banking stability, which may not capture all dimensions of financial soundness. Additionally, the analysis focuses only on Indonesia and Malaysia, limiting the generalizability of the findings. Future research should consider alternative or multiple stability indicators and include a broader set of countries for more comprehensive insights. Practical implications The findings highlight the need for stable and proactive regulation in managing Islamic banking risks. Policymakers should strengthen macroprudential oversight, monitor key risk factors and support Islamic banks through capital buffers and risk-sharing instruments to enhance resilience during crises. Originality/value This study contributes to the limited literature comparing Islamic banking stability across countries, particularly in Southeast Asia, using a dynamic econometric approach to capture cyclical fluctuations.

Journal of Islamic accounting and business research
International Centre for Education in Islamic Finance (MY), Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor (ID), Tashkent Islamic University (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.