A Systematic Review on Remote Sensing of Dryland Ecological Integrity: Improvement in the Spatiotemporal Monitoring of Vegetation Is Required

Remote sensing approaches to monitoring dryland ecosystem states and trends have been dominated by the binary distinction between degraded/non-degraded areas, leading to inconsistent results. We propose a different conceptual framework that better reflects the states and pressures of these ecosystems—ecological integrity—that is, the maintenance of ecosystem composition and its capacity to contribute to human needs and adapt to change. We systematically reviewed earth observation techniques for characterizing ecological integrity in trusted databases together with studies identified through expert-guided search. A total of 137 papers were included, and their metadata (i.e., location, year) and data (i.e., aspect of ecological integrity assessed, techniques employed) were analyzed. The results show that remote sensing ecological integrity is becoming an increasingly researched topic, especially in countries with extensive drylands. Vegetation was the most frequently monitored attribute and was often employed as an indicator of other attributes (i.e., soil and water quality) and as a key feature in approaches that aimed for a comprehensive ecosystem assessment. However, most of the literature employed the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as a descriptor of vegetation characteristics (i.e., health, structure, cover), which has been shown not to be a good indicator of the litter/senescent vegetation components that tend to frequently dominate drylands. Methods to overcome this weakness have been identified, although more research is needed to demonstrate their application in ecological integrity monitoring. Specifically, knowledge gaps in the relationship between vegetation cover fractions (i.e., green, non-green, and bare soil), descriptors of ecosystem quality (e.g., soil condition or vegetation structure complexity), and management (i.e., how human intervention affects ecosystem quality) should be addressed. Notable potential has been identified in time series analysis as a means of operationalising remotely sensed vegetation fractional cover. Nevertheless, limitations in benchmarking must also be tackled for effective ecological integrity monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18010184
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Review on Remote Sensing of Dryland Ecological Integrity: Improvement in the Spatiotemporal Monitoring of Vegetation Is Required

Adrian Fisher, Andres Sutton, Graciela Metternicht
Remote Sensing
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

A Systematic Review on Remote Sensing of Dryland Ecological Integrity: Improvement in the Spatiotemporal Monitoring of Vegetation Is Required

Adrian Fisher, Andres Sutton, Graciela Metternicht
article en

Abstract

Remote sensing approaches to monitoring dryland ecosystem states and trends have been dominated by the binary distinction between degraded/non-degraded areas, leading to inconsistent results. We propose a different conceptual framework that better reflects the states and pressures of these ecosystems—ecological integrity—that is, the maintenance of ecosystem composition and its capacity to contribute to human needs and adapt to change. We systematically reviewed earth observation techniques for characterizing ecological integrity in trusted databases together with studies identified through expert-guided search. A total of 137 papers were included, and their metadata (i.e., location, year) and data (i.e., aspect of ecological integrity assessed, techniques employed) were analyzed. The results show that remote sensing ecological integrity is becoming an increasingly researched topic, especially in countries with extensive drylands. Vegetation was the most frequently monitored attribute and was often employed as an indicator of other attributes (i.e., soil and water quality) and as a key feature in approaches that aimed for a comprehensive ecosystem assessment. However, most of the literature employed the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) as a descriptor of vegetation characteristics (i.e., health, structure, cover), which has been shown not to be a good indicator of the litter/senescent vegetation components that tend to frequently dominate drylands. Methods to overcome this weakness have been identified, although more research is needed to demonstrate their application in ecological integrity monitoring. Specifically, knowledge gaps in the relationship between vegetation cover fractions (i.e., green, non-green, and bare soil), descriptors of ecosystem quality (e.g., soil condition or vegetation structure complexity), and management (i.e., how human intervention affects ecosystem quality) should be addressed. Notable potential has been identified in time series analysis as a means of operationalising remotely sensed vegetation fractional cover. Nevertheless, limitations in benchmarking must also be tackled for effective ecological integrity monitoring.

Remote SensingVol. 18(1)
UNSW Sydney (AU), Environmental Earth Sciences (AU), Western Sydney University (AU)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.