How AI-Supported Intelligent Systems Support Infection Prevention and Control Training in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Educational Functions and Outcomes

Abstract Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly been incorporated into infection prevention and control (IPC) education, primarily to support monitoring and feedback of observable behaviors. However, existing evidence has focused largely on short-term compliance outcomes, with limited synthesis of AI’s educational role in supporting sustained IPC competence. Objective: This systematic review examined how AI-supported intelligent systems have been designed and utilized to support IPC education and training, focusing on system characteristics, educational functions, and reported outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and CINAHL. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings were synthesized qualitatively according to AI system design, educational functions, and outcome domains. Methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: Most AI-supported IPC education focused on hand hygiene and relied on fully automated monitoring systems to capture behaviors and deliver performance feedback. Educational functions were predominantly limited to assessment, automated feedback, and reminders. Outcomes were mainly measured using compliance or performance metrics, while sustained behavior change and decision quality were rarely assessed. Conclusion: AI-supported IPC education has been effective in reinforcing short-term compliance, but current applications remain limited in supporting sustained competence over time. The findings of this review suggest that AI-supported intelligent systems may function as maintenance-oriented educational supports, extending learning beyond initial instruction through repeated practice and feedback. Future research should prioritize outcome measures that capture the durability of performance and decision-making processes to better align AI-assisted IPC education with the educational demands of clinical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Science Framework
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/748fq
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How AI-Supported Intelligent Systems Support Infection Prevention and Control Training in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Educational Functions and Outcomes

Ha-Young Park
Open Science Framework
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

How AI-Supported Intelligent Systems Support Infection Prevention and Control Training in Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Educational Functions and Outcomes

Ha-Young Park
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has increasingly been incorporated into infection prevention and control (IPC) education, primarily to support monitoring and feedback of observable behaviors. However, existing evidence has focused largely on short-term compliance outcomes, with limited synthesis of AI’s educational role in supporting sustained IPC competence. Objective: This systematic review examined how AI-supported intelligent systems have been designed and utilized to support IPC education and training, focusing on system characteristics, educational functions, and reported outcomes. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane and CINAHL. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Findings were synthesized qualitatively according to AI system design, educational functions, and outcome domains. Methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: Most AI-supported IPC education focused on hand hygiene and relied on fully automated monitoring systems to capture behaviors and deliver performance feedback. Educational functions were predominantly limited to assessment, automated feedback, and reminders. Outcomes were mainly measured using compliance or performance metrics, while sustained behavior change and decision quality were rarely assessed. Conclusion: AI-supported IPC education has been effective in reinforcing short-term compliance, but current applications remain limited in supporting sustained competence over time. The findings of this review suggest that AI-supported intelligent systems may function as maintenance-oriented educational supports, extending learning beyond initial instruction through repeated practice and feedback. Future research should prioritize outcome measures that capture the durability of performance and decision-making processes to better align AI-assisted IPC education with the educational demands of clinical practice.

Open Science Framework
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.