Seismic Performance Evaluation of Conventional and Offset Outrigger with Belt Truss Systems in Tall Buildings

Tall buildings are highly vulnerable to lateral loads such as wind and earthquakes due to their slender geometry and height. To enhance their seismic performance, structural systems like outriggers and belt dresses are widely adopted. Traditionally, outriggers are connected directly to the central core, but recent advancements have explored the use of offset outriggers, which are placed away from the core, offering design flexibility and improving internal space utilization. This study investigates and compares the seismic performance of three structural configurations: A Base model without outriggers, a model with conventional outriggers and a model with offset outriggers combined with belt trusses. The analysis was performed using STAAD.Pro, considering seismic loads as per IS 1893:2019. Key performance indicators such as lateral displacement, story drift, base shear, and overturning moment were evaluated to assess the effectiveness of each configuration. Results show that both outrigger systems significantly improved seismic performance compared to the baseline, with the offset outrigger and belt system achieving the greatest reduction in lateral displacement (up to 35%) and better drift control.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Civil Engineering and Architecture
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2026.140124
Primary Topic
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Conventional and Offset Outrigger with Belt Truss Systems in Tall Buildings

Anantha N. Kamath, Sandesh Upadhyaya K., Prashanth P. N.
Civil Engineering and Architecture
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
article

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Conventional and Offset Outrigger with Belt Truss Systems in Tall Buildings

Anantha N. Kamath, Sandesh Upadhyaya K., Prashanth P. N.
article en

Abstract

Tall buildings are highly vulnerable to lateral loads such as wind and earthquakes due to their slender geometry and height. To enhance their seismic performance, structural systems like outriggers and belt dresses are widely adopted. Traditionally, outriggers are connected directly to the central core, but recent advancements have explored the use of offset outriggers, which are placed away from the core, offering design flexibility and improving internal space utilization. This study investigates and compares the seismic performance of three structural configurations: A Base model without outriggers, a model with conventional outriggers and a model with offset outriggers combined with belt trusses. The analysis was performed using STAAD.Pro, considering seismic loads as per IS 1893:2019. Key performance indicators such as lateral displacement, story drift, base shear, and overturning moment were evaluated to assess the effectiveness of each configuration. Results show that both outrigger systems significantly improved seismic performance compared to the baseline, with the offset outrigger and belt system achieving the greatest reduction in lateral displacement (up to 35%) and better drift control.

Civil Engineering and ArchitectureVol. 14(1)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Conventional and Offset Outrigger with Belt Truss Systems in Tall Buildings — Anantha N. Kamath, Sandesh Upadhyaya K., et al. · Civil Engineering and Architecture (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS