Evaluation of the accuracy of direct digital impressions versus conventional silicone impressions for post-and-core with different root space diameters: a preliminary study in vitro

Direct intraoral scanning is a viable option for post spaces with a diameter ≥ 1.5 mm and depth ≤ 7 mm. Its application is strictly limited in narrow canals (≤ 1.5 mm). For deep preparations (9 mm), a minimum diameter of 2.0 mm allows data capture but with poor reliability, whereas a diameter ≥ 2.5 mm ensures acceptable and predictable accuracy. Clinical adoption requires careful consideration of these diameter- and depth-dependent performance boundaries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-07634-3
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the accuracy of direct digital impressions versus conventional silicone impressions for post-and-core with different root space diameters: a preliminary study in vitro

Zhiqiang Zheng, Sifan Chen, Jie Lin, Jiyuan Shen et al.
BMC Oral Health
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Evaluation of the accuracy of direct digital impressions versus conventional silicone impressions for post-and-core with different root space diameters: a preliminary study in vitro

Zhiqiang Zheng, Sifan Chen, Jie Lin, Jiyuan Shen, Ruizhen Chen
article en

Abstract

Direct intraoral scanning is a viable option for post spaces with a diameter ≥ 1.5 mm and depth ≤ 7 mm. Its application is strictly limited in narrow canals (≤ 1.5 mm). For deep preparations (9 mm), a minimum diameter of 2.0 mm allows data capture but with poor reliability, whereas a diameter ≥ 2.5 mm ensures acceptable and predictable accuracy. Clinical adoption requires careful consideration of these diameter- and depth-dependent performance boundaries.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
Fujian Medical University (CN), Nippon Dental University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.