Amyloid Status and Cerebral Atrophy in Down Syndrome: a visual scale‐based analysis through normal and pathologic aging

Abstract Background Down syndrome (DS) is considered a genetic form of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is characterized by early neurodegeneration and cortical atrophy. Subjective scale‐based visual evaluation of brain atrophy is widely used in clinical neuroradiology. This study aims to evaluate brain atrophy scales in DS individuals from a young age and investigate its relationship with cortical amyloid status. Methods A bi‐centric retrospective analysis was conducted at Hospital das Clínicas, Brazil, and Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Spain, using 3T Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from individuals aged 18 years or older. Amyloid status was classified as positive (A+) or negative (A‐) based on [11C]PiB‐PET‐amyloid scans obtained within 30 days of MRI or cerebrospinal fluid analysis, with a positive result defined as an Aβ42/40 ratio < 0.062. MRI was independently analyzed by two expert neuroradiologists, who assigned scores for medial temporal atrophy (MTA), entorhinal cortex atrophy (ERICA), posterior cortical atrophy (Koedam scale), and global cerebral atrophy (GCA) for each hemisphere. The inter‐rater agreement was satisfactory, and the average (right‐left) from the more experienced neuroradiologist was used. Individuals were then separated into two groups (younger and older than 45). Results 106 individuals were initially evaluated, and 25 were excluded from the final analysis (total included N = 81). The mean age of participants was 42.7 years (19‐64 years). The sample consisted of 64 DS individuals (35% females) and 17 non‐DS controls (58% females). Thirty individuals were A+, all of them DS individuals. DS individuals exhibited higher atrophy scales, however, reaching statistical significance only for the MTA scale (hippocampal atrophy) in the ≥ 45‐year‐old group (tables 1 and 2); such atrophy was linked to higher A+ prevalence ( p ‐value < 0.05). Furthermore, higher A+ prevalence was observed in DS overall ( p ‐value < 0.05), including younger participants under 45 (Figure 1). Conclusions The MTA scale detected early‐stage hippocampal atrophy in DS, which was also linked to amyloid deposition since early adulthood, highlighting the use of this scale as a proxy for AD pathology in DS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_106085
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Amyloid Status and Cerebral Atrophy in Down Syndrome: a visual scale‐based analysis through normal and pathologic aging

Laura Cavalcanti de Oliveira, Douglas Mendes Nunes, Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel, Isabela dos Santos Alves et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Amyloid Status and Cerebral Atrophy in Down Syndrome: a visual scale‐based analysis through normal and pathologic aging

Laura Cavalcanti de Oliveira, Douglas Mendes Nunes, Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel, Isabela dos Santos Alves, Dimitri Brigide de Almeida Mantovani, Alexandre Bejanin, Juan M. Fortea, Artur Martins Coutinho, Claudia da Costa Leite, Mateus Rozalem Aranha, Daniele de Paula Faria
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Down syndrome (DS) is considered a genetic form of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is characterized by early neurodegeneration and cortical atrophy. Subjective scale‐based visual evaluation of brain atrophy is widely used in clinical neuroradiology. This study aims to evaluate brain atrophy scales in DS individuals from a young age and investigate its relationship with cortical amyloid status. Methods A bi‐centric retrospective analysis was conducted at Hospital das Clínicas, Brazil, and Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Spain, using 3T Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from individuals aged 18 years or older. Amyloid status was classified as positive (A+) or negative (A‐) based on [11C]PiB‐PET‐amyloid scans obtained within 30 days of MRI or cerebrospinal fluid analysis, with a positive result defined as an Aβ42/40 ratio < 0.062. MRI was independently analyzed by two expert neuroradiologists, who assigned scores for medial temporal atrophy (MTA), entorhinal cortex atrophy (ERICA), posterior cortical atrophy (Koedam scale), and global cerebral atrophy (GCA) for each hemisphere. The inter‐rater agreement was satisfactory, and the average (right‐left) from the more experienced neuroradiologist was used. Individuals were then separated into two groups (younger and older than 45). Results 106 individuals were initially evaluated, and 25 were excluded from the final analysis (total included N = 81). The mean age of participants was 42.7 years (19‐64 years). The sample consisted of 64 DS individuals (35% females) and 17 non‐DS controls (58% females). Thirty individuals were A+, all of them DS individuals. DS individuals exhibited higher atrophy scales, however, reaching statistical significance only for the MTA scale (hippocampal atrophy) in the ≥ 45‐year‐old group (tables 1 and 2); such atrophy was linked to higher A+ prevalence ( p ‐value < 0.05). Furthermore, higher A+ prevalence was observed in DS overall ( p ‐value < 0.05), including younger participants under 45 (Figure 1). Conclusions The MTA scale detected early‐stage hippocampal atrophy in DS, which was also linked to amyloid deposition since early adulthood, highlighting the use of this scale as a proxy for AD pathology in DS.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Hospital de Sant Pau (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (ES), Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Hospital Sírio-Libanês (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.