Character portrayal of <i>corona</i> : people around the Athenian law court

ABSTRACT This paper examines the rhetorical functions of references to corona or people surrounding the courtroom in Attic forensic speeches. It analyses the strategies deployed to characterize these spectators, classifying them into four categories: (A) witnesses of past events or the current trial, (B) individuals who are easily influenced by the outcome of a trial, (C) ‘judges’ of the jurors, and (D) supporters of either side of the contending parties. Category A often serves to enhance the speaker’s credibility. Category B is used to remind the jurors of the broader implications of their verdict. Category C frequently encourages the jurors to consider the shame they may face if they vote against the public interest. Category D is employed for character assassination of the opponent. Orators strategically used these rhetorical tactics, especially during high-profile trials. While Category D did not always appear to benefit the litigants, Categories B and C seemed to be comparatively more favourable for the plaintiffs.