Inventory of Attitude Towards Gender-Inclusive Language (ATGIL)

Abstract: Introduction: Promotion of gender-inclusive language has become a key political goal. Legal mandates have led to increased adoption in administration, but everyday use remains relatively uncommon. While the advantages of gender-inclusive language (greater sense of inclusion) are widely acknowledged, many individuals still refrain from actively using it. Reasons include cultural norms, habits, resistance to change, and personal values. Aim: Current instruments to assess the use of gender-inclusive language do not fully grasp the underlying reasons. Hence, their insights do not inform actionable measures to address the underlying reasons. We developed a comprehensive 21-item questionnaire that produces insights both on motivational aspects and level (emotion/cognition/behavior). Methods: The questionnaire follows the facet-theory approach and also includes a condensed 7-item version. The questionnaire was validated with data collected from two independent samples, comprising 279 participants. Results: The condensed 7-item version shows good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha .942) and excellent discriminant power ( r it ranging from .69 to .88). Conclusion: We recommend using this tool to evaluate the factors motivating the use of gender-inclusive language and to inform the development of strategies and measures aimed at promoting its wider adoption both in Germany and internationally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychology Open
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1024/2673-8627/a000091
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inventory of Attitude Towards Gender-Inclusive Language (ATGIL)

Julia Rieke Hagemann, Jan Marten Ihme, C. Schwarz, Janne Nitschke et al.
European Journal of Psychology Open
Gender Studies in Language
article

Inventory of Attitude Towards Gender-Inclusive Language (ATGIL)

Julia Rieke Hagemann, Jan Marten Ihme, C. Schwarz, Janne Nitschke, Janna Looft, Marie Dawideit
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Promotion of gender-inclusive language has become a key political goal. Legal mandates have led to increased adoption in administration, but everyday use remains relatively uncommon. While the advantages of gender-inclusive language (greater sense of inclusion) are widely acknowledged, many individuals still refrain from actively using it. Reasons include cultural norms, habits, resistance to change, and personal values. Aim: Current instruments to assess the use of gender-inclusive language do not fully grasp the underlying reasons. Hence, their insights do not inform actionable measures to address the underlying reasons. We developed a comprehensive 21-item questionnaire that produces insights both on motivational aspects and level (emotion/cognition/behavior). Methods: The questionnaire follows the facet-theory approach and also includes a condensed 7-item version. The questionnaire was validated with data collected from two independent samples, comprising 279 participants. Results: The condensed 7-item version shows good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha .942) and excellent discriminant power ( r it ranging from .69 to .88). Conclusion: We recommend using this tool to evaluate the factors motivating the use of gender-inclusive language and to inform the development of strategies and measures aimed at promoting its wider adoption both in Germany and internationally.

European Journal of Psychology Open
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.