Accelerating cancer treatment optimisation: A multistakeholder roadmap from the Cancer Medicines Forum

Medicines are often tested in highly controlled environments during clinical trials aimed at rapid development and thorough assessment of their benefits and risks, with key efficacy and safety aspects evaluated for regulatory approval. However, important questions regarding the optimisation of medicines' use in clinical practice may remain unanswered at the time of marketing authorisation, notably those related to the optimal dose, duration, schedule, sequence, and combination of treatments. This knowledge gap is particularly critical in oncology, where patient quality of life must be prioritised, and there is the pressing need to understand the most efficient use of costly innovative therapies in the context of rising cancer incidence and prevalence. Addressing these challenges requires multi-stakeholder collaboration. Organisations within the Cancer Medicines Forum (CMF), co-chaired by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the European Medicines Agency, have advocated for policy actions promoting treatment optimisation research within the European Union. To advance this objective, the CMF convened a multidisciplinary stakeholder workshop, offering a platform for collaborative dialogue by bringing together experts from governmental bodies, regulatory agencies, health technology assessment bodies, patient organisations, academia, learned societies, industry, public health organisations, clinicians, and investigators. This workshop aimed to examine existing barriers and explore strategies to integrate treatment optimisation into the current cancer clinical research framework, ultimately providing key recommendations, summarised in this review, to systematically embed treatment optimisation in oncology research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cancer Policy
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100700
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accelerating cancer treatment optimisation: A multistakeholder roadmap from the Cancer Medicines Forum

Guy Brusselle, Momir Radulović, Daniel A. Goldstein, Bertrand F. TOMBAL et al.
Journal of Cancer Policy
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Accelerating cancer treatment optimisation: A multistakeholder roadmap from the Cancer Medicines Forum

Guy Brusselle, Momir Radulović, Daniel A. Goldstein, Bertrand F. TOMBAL, Iphigénie Korakis, Martin H. Kaiser, R. Sullivan, Beate Wieseler, Gwénaëlle Gravis, Ana E. Amariutei, Christopher M. Booth, Denis Lacombe, Michael Zaiac, Francesco Pignatti, Pierre Démolis, Fábio Cardoso Borges, Caroline Voltz-Girolt, Rosa Giuliani, Raffaella Casolino
article en

Abstract

Medicines are often tested in highly controlled environments during clinical trials aimed at rapid development and thorough assessment of their benefits and risks, with key efficacy and safety aspects evaluated for regulatory approval. However, important questions regarding the optimisation of medicines' use in clinical practice may remain unanswered at the time of marketing authorisation, notably those related to the optimal dose, duration, schedule, sequence, and combination of treatments. This knowledge gap is particularly critical in oncology, where patient quality of life must be prioritised, and there is the pressing need to understand the most efficient use of costly innovative therapies in the context of rising cancer incidence and prevalence. Addressing these challenges requires multi-stakeholder collaboration. Organisations within the Cancer Medicines Forum (CMF), co-chaired by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the European Medicines Agency, have advocated for policy actions promoting treatment optimisation research within the European Union. To advance this objective, the CMF convened a multidisciplinary stakeholder workshop, offering a platform for collaborative dialogue by bringing together experts from governmental bodies, regulatory agencies, health technology assessment bodies, patient organisations, academia, learned societies, industry, public health organisations, clinicians, and investigators. This workshop aimed to examine existing barriers and explore strategies to integrate treatment optimisation into the current cancer clinical research framework, ultimately providing key recommendations, summarised in this review, to systematically embed treatment optimisation in oncology research.

Journal of Cancer PolicyVol. 47
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), European Medicines Agency (NL), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE), Inserm (FR), Daiichi Sankyo (Germany) (DE), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Queen's University (CA), Rabin Medical Center (IL), Ghent University Hospital (BE), European Hematology Association (NL), Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (DE), Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole (FR), World Health Organization (CH), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (BE), Daiichi-Sankyo (South Korea) (KR), Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia (HR), Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille (FR), European Patent Organisation (DE), Daiichi Sankyo (United States) (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.