Population-adjusted network meta-analyses provide new insights into the efficacy of treatment alternatives for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer
<b>Aim:</b> Recent network meta-analyses (NMAs) in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer have not adequately addressed potential treatment effect modifiers and population imbalances, which introduces bias. Although, individual-patient data (IPD) are seldom available across all trials, recent methodological advances allow adjustments using a combination of IPD and aggregate data. <b>Materials & methods:</b> IPD from the ARASENS trial (darolutamide + docetaxel + androgen-deprivation-therapy [ADT]) and aggregate data from a systematic review were analyzed. Two methods were used to adjust for population imbalances: multilevel network meta-regression (ML-NMR) using baseline characteristics, and network meta-interpolation (NMI) using subgroup data. Relative effects were estimated for an ARASENS-like population, with sensitivity analysis in an average trial population. <b>Results:</b> Twelve studies, including ARASENS, were included. All studies reported baseline characteristics for ML-NMR. Sufficient subgroup data for NMI were available in 8/12 studies for overall survival (OS) and 5/12 studies for progression-free survival (PFS). Darolutamide + docetaxel + ADT showed significant benefit over docetaxel + ADT, ADT and standard-nonsteroidal-antiandrogen + ADT in all analyses. ML-NMR showed improved OS for darolutamide + docetaxel + ADT compared with abiraterone + docetaxel + ADT, apalutamide + ADT, enzalutamide + ADT and abiraterone + ADT. ML-NMR also showed improved PFS for darolutamide + docetaxel + ADT compared with apalutamide + ADT and enzalutamide + ADT. Using NMI, darolutamide + docetaxel + ADT demonstrated OS benefit over abiraterone + ADT and PFS benefit relative to abiraterone + ADT and apalutamide + ADT. Findings were consistent in an average population, although ML-NMR did not show significant OS benefit of darolutamide + docetaxel + ADT over apalutamide + ADT. <b>Conclusion:</b> Improved outcomes were observed with darolutamide + docetaxel + ADT compared with other therapies. By incorporating effect modifiers and addressing population imbalances, we provide clinicians with a more accurate understanding of treatment efficacy for better-informed decision-making.
Authors
- Edna Keeney
- David Phillippo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2672-7841)
- Noman Paracha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3438-4853)
- H Thom
- Philip Orishaba (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1236-8529)
- Alicia Katherine Morgans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6563-4587)
- N. Shore
- Martin Boegemann
- Eva Gallagher
- David Aceituno
- Christopher JD Wallis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5990-4026)
Institutions
- Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
- University Health Network (CA)
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
- German Cancer Research Center (DE)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- West Cancer Center (US)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- Bayer (Switzerland) (CH)
- Carolina Urologic Research Center (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Published
- 2026-01-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2025-0100
- Primary Topic
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00